Moving from Blue Heaven to Silver Reference II


Hi everyone,

Just wondering what one would expect moving from a Nordost Blue Heaven to an Acoustic Zen Silver Reference II interconnect? Associated equipement is a Cary 303/200 (i.e. a little forward of neutral) and a Plinius 8200 integrated (i.e. dark) going to Soliloquy 6.2 speakers (i.e. warm, limited treble) via Acoustic Zen Satori. I'm a fluid midrange and realistic cymbals...

Thank you
portugal11

Showing 2 responses by soix

I also run Satori Shotgun into Soliloquy 6.2s, and while the Matrix II will add some midrange heft the 6.2s already have a fairly weighty midrange on their own. The problem is that the 6.2s aren't the quickest speakers on the planet, at least in the lower frequencies, and I find the Matrix II makes this even more of an issue. I also find the Silver Ref. II much cleaner in the treble range, and as such portrays cymbals and the like in a much more real and believable manner (one of the best I've heard in this regard). My take is that the added midrange punch provided by the Matrix II might not be necessary with the 6.2s (obviously very taste dependent though) while also taking a toll at both frequency extremes, and the Silver Ref II is certainly no slouch in the mids. I'd still find a way to try both before purchasing either, but hope this provides some frame of reference that may be useful.

Best of luck.
I'm running an Oppo 970 into an EVS DAC1, a Marsh 2000b preamp, and a McCormack DNA Rev. A. Relatively speaking I find these to be fairly neutral components that pass the majority of information through with very little editorializing of their own (OK, the Marsh may be just a wee bit polite, but it works in the context of my system). I'm an amateur drummer, and I'm particularly very happy with what I hear in cymbal reproduction with this combo and the 6.2s although that's always a personal interpretation. I might not get the nth degree of extension and bite, but the character, tone, and weight of cymbals (i.e. being able to clearly hear the drummer's using a heavy ride) come through very effectively, which to me is more important than sizzle and pop that can often obsure that important information. On good recordings I can even sense and almost feel the wobble of a crash cymbal on its stand, which is something I lose with most other speakers. In some respects I think it's the lower treble that really communicates the feel of the cymbals, and I think this is a strength of the 6.2s. I haven't heard the Plinius, but if it's truly dark sounding I wonder if that might be obscuring some of the upper-octave detail that's dulling cymbals for you.

Anyway, I've used the Silver Ref IIs between my DAC and pre and pre and amp, and although the Matrix IIs do nice things to the mids when I put them in between my pre and amp, it thickens and slows the sound through the 6.2s too much for my liking. And the Silver Ref IIs do a good enough job in the mids with my setup that I don't miss the added glow of their purple sibs.

I've also compared the shotgun Satoris with a single run with jumpers, and it's very close with the shotgun setup adding a small dose of oomph and weight to the overall presentation that I prefer, but it is a relatively small difference. If you're looking for an improvement in cymbal reproduction I think your money might be better spent elsewhere.

I've blabbed enough. Hope this helps.