Low SET versus High SET


Low powered SET tubes:
2a3, 300b, 45 and 50.

High powered SET tubes:
32b, 52b, gm70, 845 and 211

Are there any generalities about the frequency output ranges and sonic characteristics (not power output or consumption) that can be made about low and high powered SET tubes?

What is your favorite high powered SET output tube?

(I'm assuming all are used in SET topologies into a speaker load appropriate to their power output). The question was inspired by the spirited debate about low power tubes in the SET v OTL thread.

Let me know your opinion. Thanks, Jeff
jj2468

Showing 1 response by trelja

Presuming I have a sympathetic pair of loudspeakers to mate the amplifier with, and admitting to being willing to live with the inherent tradeoffs of the marriage, I prefer the lower power SET amps. There is a certain magic there that I feel the larger tubes cannot match.

Of course, in most real world scenarios, where people use more conventional loudspeakers, if one is going to choose the SET route, you would need the higher power variants.

However, as opposed to going the 211 or 845 route, I've personally found more happiness in either using the smaller tubes in either parallel single-ended (preferred) or push-pull operation, or even (heaven forbid!) a good Class A push-pull EL34 amp.