I can't comment directly on their synergy with the Lamm amp, but I've heard both the FS Dlx Mk2 and the LL2 pre-amps. The First Sound is superior, IMO.
Lamm LL2 preamp VS First Sound 4.0 MKII preamp
Dear audiogoners , i actually have the thought to connect my lamm ml2's to the mentioned preamps .
My speakers are the kharma 3.2 f + cesb sub 1.0.
Surely the same brand is important, i mean is obvious to set as preamp the ll2 before the ml2's.But from the other side a preamp so pure with step attenuators each for chanel is a challenging idea as the First Sound has got.
Who test the combination lamm ll2 with the ml2's or the ml2.1's and who the combo first sound 4.0 mkii or enen with paramount upgrade or special edition upgrade with the ml2's or ml2,1's?
Are really sonic differences between the 2possibilities?
My speakers are the kharma 3.2 f + cesb sub 1.0.
Surely the same brand is important, i mean is obvious to set as preamp the ll2 before the ml2's.But from the other side a preamp so pure with step attenuators each for chanel is a challenging idea as the First Sound has got.
Who test the combination lamm ll2 with the ml2's or the ml2.1's and who the combo first sound 4.0 mkii or enen with paramount upgrade or special edition upgrade with the ml2's or ml2,1's?
Are really sonic differences between the 2possibilities?