Is soundstaging emblematic of reality?


Now that finally I have a system that soundstages excellently, I’m wondering if it’s actually  a vital component of a real concert experience.  In most genres of music, unless you’re sitting very close to the action, you don’t get the kind of precise imaging revealed in a good stereo setup.  That’s because microphones are usually (with some rare exceptions) placed close up. If you’re sitting in the middle to back section of an audience (which most people do) you certainly don’t hear anything close to holographic imaging, or even what most people accept as satisfactory imaging. 
Granted, it’s loads of fun to hear this soundstaging. And I certainly love it.  Some people might consider it the ideal music experience. But is it an essential component of musical enjoyment?


128x128rvpiano

Showing 1 response by pgaulke60

On the other hand, if you listen to some good live recordings, there is a very high probability you will never hear that same perfection and separation of instruments as you would on the recording in a live venue.  Case in point, listen to the spring '77 Betty Board recordings and the 72 Dan Healy recordings of the Grateful Dead. The are incredible sounding recordings. Listen to a Here Comes Sunshine from 71-73 with headphones and you know exactly what I mean.  

If you are listening to the Bruce Springsteen wall of sound, it doesn't matter where you sit in the venue, or your home.  You are still going to get blasted with that damn wall of sound.  I really appreciate Bruce, but when you can't distinguish the instruments, then well, I'll go back to Phil Spector.