Integrated or Receiver?


That is the question.

As my luck would have it, my near 30 year old Denon PMA520 integrated amp is apparently on its way out.  I've already spent $150 to fix one problem only to have one channel all but vanish (can hear some high end audio but it is faint) and the other channel cuts in and out.  Since I had the unit cleaned just a few weeks ago and the noise that had cropped up in deep bass, I would have to believe this is another problem and would require additional servicing at additional cost.

The way I see it, this is throwing good money after bad.  Will probably scrap this thing and will buy something new.

Since my budget is going to be under $400 right now thanks to a slew of other expenses that take priority, I am wondering if I should just settle for a basic entry level amp like the Yamaha 301 or Onkyo 9050 or purchase a Receiver from Yamaha or some other company that is fairly inexpensive and use that for a couple of years until I can buy a better integrated amp when I should have more money to budget for it.

Any thoughts on this?
will62

Showing 2 responses by cleeds

will62
One problem I am running into is trying to find a amp or receiver that will allow me to Biwire my 6 ohm Mirage OM 10's.  Every amp or receiver I've looked at can't handle the lower impedance except when the OM 10's are not Biwired.  My Castle's are 8 ohm and don't present that problem. 
Will you please explain why you think biwiring will change the load seen by an amplifier?

will62
Sounds like Bi wiring is not the formal definition of using two pairs of speakers at the same time with one amp
Correct. Biwiring is running separate cables for LF and HF from a single amplifier to a speaker that has separate connections for each. It is often confused with biamping, which is using a separate amplifier channel for each LF and HF speaker input.