Fast switching is far more revealing than long term tests; auditory memory is less reliable as time goes by. Here’s a good synopsis of a paper on the subject:
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/aes-paper-digest-sensitivity-and-reliability-of-abx-blind-testing.186/
I’m a cable skeptic, which puts me in a (somewhat reviled) minority on this forum. But the evidence is clear that for all the differences audiophiles write about with respect to cables, the perceived differences utterly and completely fail to replicate under scientifically controlled conditions.
We don’t listen under controlled conditions, and that is certainly also something to think about - you should buy what will make you happy in your listening at home. But the overwhelming testing evidence should give you pause as to whether you should spend any money at all on fancy cables.
You should absolutely conduct some AB (or better ABX) tests, blind if possible, with as quick a comparison as you can manage. But then do what makes you happiest with your newly expanded knowledge.
Here are two good thread with compendia of various blind tests:
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/testing-audiophile-claims-and-myths.486598/
https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,82777.0.html
Specifically for cables
http://djcarlst.provide.net/abx_wire.htm
and stay tuned for the surprise reveal at the end of this one:
https://www.audio-forums.com/articles/interconnect-cable-blind-listening-test.15/
You might also want to look at Ethan Winer’s null tester results - the cables aren’t even sending significantly different signals, so why, exactly, would the speakers behave differently when presented with the same exact electrical signal?
https://www.audioxpress.com/article/you-can-diy-building-a-null-tester-device
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/aes-paper-digest-sensitivity-and-reliability-of-abx-blind-testing.186/
I’m a cable skeptic, which puts me in a (somewhat reviled) minority on this forum. But the evidence is clear that for all the differences audiophiles write about with respect to cables, the perceived differences utterly and completely fail to replicate under scientifically controlled conditions.
We don’t listen under controlled conditions, and that is certainly also something to think about - you should buy what will make you happy in your listening at home. But the overwhelming testing evidence should give you pause as to whether you should spend any money at all on fancy cables.
You should absolutely conduct some AB (or better ABX) tests, blind if possible, with as quick a comparison as you can manage. But then do what makes you happiest with your newly expanded knowledge.
Here are two good thread with compendia of various blind tests:
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/testing-audiophile-claims-and-myths.486598/
https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,82777.0.html
Specifically for cables
http://djcarlst.provide.net/abx_wire.htm
and stay tuned for the surprise reveal at the end of this one:
https://www.audio-forums.com/articles/interconnect-cable-blind-listening-test.15/
You might also want to look at Ethan Winer’s null tester results - the cables aren’t even sending significantly different signals, so why, exactly, would the speakers behave differently when presented with the same exact electrical signal?
https://www.audioxpress.com/article/you-can-diy-building-a-null-tester-device