Anybody that buys a Sasha for $38,000 without falling in love with it first deservers to be parted from their money! I doubt that the KEF sounds anything like the Sasha. Each has it's own list of pluses and minuses... but each one represents the best that can be had AT THAT PRICE RANGE. For me..... I'd never spend $38k on something that wasn't absolutely full range. But if 38k is no big deal to you, and you have a small room, then it might be the perfect choice. It's all very simple.... Why are people confused?
How does this make sense, any sense? Any sense at all??
I was just looking at Stereophile's recommended components, for speakers.
Within the Class A restricted extreme low frequencies category are:
KEF LS50 at $1500 and
Wilson Sasha at $38,000.
Why would you pay 38 grand when you can get the same category for 1500? Why I say?
Even worse!!!
In the full range Class B category we have the KEF Ref. 5 at $20,000.
Why would you wanna pay $20,000 for a speaker that is outclassed by the same family (KEF LS50) at a fraction of the price?
How does this make any sense????
Stereophile, seriously. Let 'er rip homie.
Within the Class A restricted extreme low frequencies category are:
KEF LS50 at $1500 and
Wilson Sasha at $38,000.
Why would you pay 38 grand when you can get the same category for 1500? Why I say?
Even worse!!!
In the full range Class B category we have the KEF Ref. 5 at $20,000.
Why would you wanna pay $20,000 for a speaker that is outclassed by the same family (KEF LS50) at a fraction of the price?
How does this make any sense????
Stereophile, seriously. Let 'er rip homie.