2. digital
  3. 1159121014

EMM LABS CDSD/DCC2 Tweaks

Hi Guys,

So I have the latest EMM combo BEFORE the SE upgrade (I have a USB port on my CDSD, and latest software, but no SE on the DCC2). My question is: what tweaks have you made to this combo that you believe have made a significant difference? This includes power, interconnect, isolation, etc...

I find that my system tends to sound great, but it is a little sibilant! It also tends to be overly warm almost, and though there is detail, the mid range seems over pronounced without enough low end punch to ground it.

In comparison, but DV50 (unmodified) sounds less "analog" and refined to some degree, but displays a more punchy bass, a sense that the high's reach higher (more balanced in respect to the midrange). There is no sibilance issue with the DV50, although this source can sound tinny, or thin or overly analytical -> hence my reason to switch.

Here is some system information:

CDSD/DCC2 -> PS Audio P600;
Speakers: Paradigm Signature 2
IC's: All Virtual Dynamics Revelation and Masters
PC's: Provided Kimber Power Cords / Shunyata Copper head on PS Audio
Headphones (which I listen to most often): Sennheiser Orpheus HE90/HEV90

Currently getting custom built HEV90 replacement amp which should sound fanatastic (by Singlepower Audio).

thanks for any comments!

Neil
l0d015

Showing 2 responses by l0d015

l0d015 OP
3 posts
 
I also have a Shunyata, hydra 2. The issue didn't resolve itself much by going straight into the hydra-2. But I have not tried switching out the kimber cords. Another thing that is going on today is a comparison/audition with the MBL 1611D/1621 combo & the EMM Labs gear. I think this should prove insightful in one way or another.
l0d015 OP
3 posts
 
Alex,

I also tried the DV50 into the DCC2. It had greater bottom end punch and a tinnier, less warm sound in comparison. I felt however, that the treble range actually had more weight. I DID notice sibilance however. I then connected the DV50 fro it's 2ch outs directly into my amp. Basically reverting to my previous setup. And here is where I really appreciate the suggestion: I found the sound to be what I rememeber and feel is currently lacking, with the exception that there still is a hint of sibilance!

I had my DV50 on the floor and not on my rack. But one other thing I forgot to mention was the rack itself, which is new. I have a feeling that this rack is possibly worse off than my previous table, and both the DV50 on the floor and the EMM labs in the rack are creating the perception of greater brightness/sibilance, possibly due to mechanical vibrations. Will have to experiment.

thanks for all the responses so far.

Neil
More to discover