Lots of reasons why what a reviewer states may not be the same thing as what you experience.
That's why you should take any review, good or bad, with a grain or two of salt and in the end you can only trust your own ears.
In general, the media these days seems almost always biased one way or another and in many cases incompetent and completely unable to report or analyze anything correctly.
Why should audio "journalists" be any different?
That's why you should take any review, good or bad, with a grain or two of salt and in the end you can only trust your own ears.
In general, the media these days seems almost always biased one way or another and in many cases incompetent and completely unable to report or analyze anything correctly.
Why should audio "journalists" be any different?