Cost of Keeping Components on All the Time?


Hi Everyone,

The original poster in the thread below asked whether he should keep his equipment on at all times. The answer was pretty much "it depends."

http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?htech&1228170308&openflup&39&4#39

My question is more about cost: I'm curious if anyone has noticed an increase in their electric bill from keeping things like SS power amps, tube amps, AVRs on all the time. Of course I realize that too would depend on various factors, but I'm just looking for some overall guidance. Are we talking a few bucks a month, or more/less? My components are listed below to give you a sense of the scale I'm talking about. I'd prefer to leave everything on all the time except when I'll be away overnight.

Logitech Squeezebox (for streaming WAVs from my PC)
Cambridge Audio DacMagic
Cary SLP-05 (for stereo pre)
Adcom GFA-555 (for stereo amp)
Arcam AVR-600 (for HT/surround)
Oppo BDP-103 (Blu-ray video and SACD)
Vandersteen 2ceSig IIs (mains; bi-amp/bi-wire capable)
Vandersteen 2W (subwoofer)
Vandersteen VSM-1 (surrounds)
meowist

Showing 1 response by justlisten

My bill was running $230 a month. In mid December I decided to remove a PS Audio p600 and just run my monoblocks off the wall. My bill just dropped to $194 in 2 weeks without the p600. I would not power the p600 on unless I planned to listen , but even just plugged in the p600 still sucked a lot of power.

I leave my front end gear on 24/7.

Where I live has really odd ways to charge for power. PGE in California. If you lack periods of only essential power most of the day, you get penalized. I imagine a full month without the p600 will lower my bill even more significantly next month.