ARC 100.2 vs. D240?


My local high end dealer offered me a swap of my 100.2 plus $500 for a mint condition D240. I'm currently running a pair of B&W 640i's with an eye toward uprading to the JM Lab Electra 946. I also use an Aragon Soundstage pre-pro. I probably listen to 70% music (mostly acoustic jazz) and 30% movies. My listening room is an open floor plan that measures 20'x 30' with 10' ceilings. Which one would offer a more "tube like" sound? Is the the D240 a significant upgrade over the 100.2 or is my dealer full of it? Any advice or suggestions is greatly appreciated!
herb4

Showing 2 responses by 9rw

Your dealer is indeed full of it. I've owned the ARC 240MKII and the 100.2. The 100.2 is vastly superior in all aspects and worth about $1,000 more than the 240. I'd stay away from that dealer forever. Also, the ARC D400MKII is indeed a great amplifer, but it's better than the 100.2 only if you need the additional power. Otherwise, stick with the 100.2. They fly out of Audiogon for between $1,700 and $1,800.
herb4: Have you tried your 100.2 at the dealer's place with the JM Lab speakers? That might be an interesting experiment. I'd be amazed if the D240 sounded better than the 100.2. And keep in mind that there's a D240MKII, which most dealers (and Audio Research) believe is A LOT better than the D240.

Anyway, I still wouldn't trust that dealer. Market value of the old D240 is at least $1,000 less than the 100.2. Happy listening.