amir_asr
Responses from amir_asr
| Good read: why comparing specifications is pointless @kota1 Isn't there a lot of flutter echo? Flutter echo? In a room with open floor plan like mine or Dr. Toole's? Do you even know what that is? Clearly not. I have never seen anyone in these argument contradict himself left and right like... | |
| Good read: why comparing specifications is pointless @jerrybj I’ve only been in this audio game for 46 years, Amir. What annoys most are two things: 1. Absolutes, with no tolerance for possibilities. Things are this way, the earth is flat etc. 2. Those who emphatically believe my experience is... | |
| Good read: why comparing specifications is pointless @kota1 If you want to get "schooled by Toole", check out his room. Maybe you should. Earlier you said this: "You take Revel or some other good measuring speaker, put it in a room with hard flat surfaces and you don’t need a FR chart to kno... | |
| Good read: why comparing specifications is pointless @oddiofyl I listened to several DACs from $1500 to $6k and guess what? They all sounded different, but they all sounded quite good. You didn't "listen" to them. You included your eye and the rest of your senses. So yes, we do have to gues... | |
| Good read: why comparing specifications is pointless @jerryg123 Wow such arrogance. | |
| Good read: why comparing specifications is pointless @jerrybj Why would you even bother coming here Amir? Well, it certainly isn't for hugs and kisses from the few of you this way! 😁 I came here because someone here created a thread saying Audio Science Review is a "cult" and is not open to a... | |
| Good read: why comparing specifications is pointless @ghdprentice I would not begin to consider evaluating a single new component without listening to it for a couple months. I appreciate that you think you need that much time to evaluate a component. But you and I are not similarly situated ... | |
| Good read: why comparing specifications is pointless @juanmanuelfangioii @amir_asr So how do the folks at other review based organizations do it? Sterophile, PTA, M&S, PF, ... I know they are better equipped in both staff and technology, and they are dedicated to one mission or job, Reviews. ... | |
| Good read: why comparing specifications is pointless @kota1 I am not being critical of your ability to use a laptop and a mic. The fact that Denon’s own measurements matches yours is good The issue I am bringing to your attention is obvious, you have to review it under the conditions it is design... | |
| Good read: why comparing specifications is pointless @westcoastaudiophile "Every Denon and Marantz review is done with prior consultation with the company" LOL! -what is your price tag for “agreed" review? Well, you tell me. Here is the conclusion of the Denon AVR-X3800H Review: Conclusions... | |
| Good read: why comparing specifications is pointless @jerryg123 @amir_asr Stick to your base. Kids with limited financial resources. Oh? So only rich old people hang around this forum? Didn't know! Others agree? How old are you? And how wealthy are you? | |
| Good read: why comparing specifications is pointless @kota1 @amir_asr you said: Even major companies like Denon are using and producing same measurements as me although sadly they are not releasing them to consumers. OK, let’s take a look at the Sound United "Experience Center" where they test ... | |
| Good read: why comparing specifications is pointless @cleeds This guy @amir_as is just the latest Youtuber wannabe guru to use Audiogon as a tool to drive traffic to their website where they hope to generate revenue. My youtube channel has no monetization (ads) even though I am fully qualified... | |
| Good read: why comparing specifications is pointless @juanmanuelfangioii How about you listen to the equipment you review instead of just measuring befor formulating an opinion. I listen to well over half of all devices I review. Every speaker, headphone, headphone amp/dac, gets listened to f... | |
| Good read: why comparing specifications is pointless @tantejuut The problem is a lack of standards in specs and measurement methods between companies and reviewers. This is part of the problem. The biggest issue is that companies are either not measuring, or have rudimentary/obsolete gear for ... |