Lamm ML2.1 Tubes


Hello, I run the ML2.1 with the tubes from factory and I am interested in opinions about using it with NOS Tubes.
Compared to the stock 12AX7 I tried NOS Telefunken 12AX7 and Mullard CV4004. There are differences, but nothing dramatic (in my opinion).
Are NOS really worth it (in general) or did someone find the match to go?
Thanks
thomasheisig
Thank you Pierre for the New Sensor - Mullard ECC83/12AX7, didn't know that.
Thank you Triode, I will try to get some info about the difference between ribbed/smooth plate.
Thanks Rcprince, too. Well, honestly I don't want to change something, probably a bit more of everything. I have some Tele 12AX7 from my former Aesthetix Callisto, they've been really expensive. I listened to them now for 2h and yes, they are different to stock, but the price is 10x+ ....
I have the same opinion as you. After trying NOS Tele's and NOS GE's, I've decided the stock tubes sounded more like I wanted to hear. I must not have those golden ears or in the Lamm ML2.1 circuit design there's no improvement to be gained. I'm not selling those Tele's and GE's just in case.
I prefer the Amperex 12AX7 long plate D getters in my ML2's. These seem to have the best combination of clarity and bass. I liked the midrange of the Telefunken smooth plates but theywere too light in the bass in my system. Unfortunately the Amperex will set you back a few hundred dollars.
Dear Gerry, yes, the "Upgraditis" is like a wave, up and down, thank you Dmailer for your experience, Amperex is an interesting choice.