B W 802 Matrix III: Bright shrieky?


I have a friend who recently purchased B&W 802 Nautilus spkrs. After break-in, I must say I am impressed with the sound, & they are not BRIGHT, as I expected them to be. He tends to like more upfront & brighter sound than I do, so when he told me that the 802 Matrix III's he had before these (I hadn't heard these), WERE quite bright. He also says they don't hold a CANDLE to the Nautilus 802s.

I like the Nautilus, but don't want to spend that kind of money. I am wondering if B&W ophiles have any opinions on these two speakers. Would used 802 III's sound anything like his Nautilus? Or would I be disappointed---
kevziek
I heard the N802s at Stereo exchange with Brystons driving them,and they sound great.I have the 802 IIIs,If I can afford it I would upgrade to the 802N but I'm very happy with the 802IIIs,and they sound great with tubes on top and S.S.on the bottoms.I currently have the C.J.MOSFET 200 w.p.c power amp on them full range.I would agree that the 802 matrix III lean toward the bright side but I like it like that.CHEERS.
I've got the 802M 3's and I'm using a Proceed combo AVP/HPA to power them with JPS Labs SC+ interconnects/digital ic. They sound really good, detailed but smooth. The Proceed amp was a big improvement over the baby krell that was powering them; they are power hungry speakers! I hear the Nautilus 802's are easier to drive. And I'll second the statement from above about these being a classic!
The B&W Matrix series was a superbly engineered and executed speaker design, but the Xovers are a real compromise. They had to save money somewhere, so they used pretty cheap components there. There is an aftermarket upgrade available which takes the system to another level of clarity, smoothness, and dynamics. The North Creek Music outboard Xovers are designed to be the cost no object substitute for B&W's cheesey design. They are an astounding improvement to an already excellent speaker.