LFE vs High-level subwoofer connection, for FIDELITY


Simple as it sounds. What subwoofer connection method offers higher fidelity, and why? The LFE, 75 ohm unbalanced RCA cable. Or high-level, speaker wire to the binding posts of the amp. I am running 2 KEF KC92 subwoofers to a Soul Note A-2 Ver. 1 amplifier.
 

Grok Ai states it matches your speakers tonal balance, timing cues, and sonic signature, because it shares the same signal path through the amplifier that your speakers sound travels through. It’s also a great way to get tube or amp sound into your bass region. My LFE outputs from my Khozmo Acoustics pre-amp, bypassing the amplifiers elite and favorable sound.  The PS audio subwoofer had not been released yet or I’d have swoope those up, instead of the KEFs.

Also, has anyone heard that it is straining or damaging to a truly balanced, direct coupled amplifier to use high level inputs? This was mentioned to me and I can’t recall how reliable a source it came from. 

jbuddha882

>> "If your crossover is below 40Hz it doesn't make a difference because you cannot localize it."

Technically that's more like 100 hz for localization but in actuality but the problem is that distortion artifacts and the fact that crossovers are not a brick wall has subwoofers producing stuff that's well over 100 hz.  

 

>> "Thought some of the issue is that LFE is made for movies, it's an "effects" channel."

yes...but... 

Home theater mixes specifically include a separate LFE channel with a bunch of subwoofer effects that is completely thrown away if you try to use high level inputs and is inherently a really stupid thing to do in a home theater setup.  

However, for whatever reason, subwoofer manufacturers decided to simply label the low level inputs as "LFE".  I personally think it's dumb and misleading.  I guess their logic is that you have stereo inputs but only one, usually the left channel, is labeled LFE, which usually correlates to an LFE output on a receiver.  

@paducahhometheater 

Technically that’s more like 100 hz for localization but in actuality but the problem is that distortion artifacts and the fact that crossovers are not a brick wall has subwoofers producing stuff that’s well over 100 hz.

Run some test tones, not real content producing full bandwidth. The limit where I cannot localize it is 37Hz and will vary by room. Also as @larryincmh mentioned being able to localize sub 60Hz in the right channel:

so I had to listen to that Soundgarden song on my system. As the song starts I hear the music only on the right channel which is the guitar solo.

As shown earlier, the spectrum from the music file confirms a sub 60Hz guitar solo in the right channel.

https://mega.nz/file/nUpgDRSR#zUWAdeA4LpDZaXdVsJ8HGblhy9q-z6UZ7Knz0SOJt8M

 

Home theater mixes specifically include a separate LFE channel with a bunch of subwoofer effects that is completely thrown away if you try to use high level inputs

This isn’t correct. Set Speakers = Large and Subwoofer = No. This sends LFE to the mains and subwoofer (using high level). Further subwoofer effect is mono. Directional (localizable) bass is retained using high level, or as Denon has done, they created ’directional bass’ for LFE to retain full range or high level performance.

 

>> "As shown earlier, the spectrum from the music file confirms a sub 60Hz guitar solo in the right channel."

Guitars don’t typically produce sub-60 hz.  The fundamental of a low E is 82 hz.  Even drop D tuning is 74 hz.  It’s not going to produce anything lower.  Most of the energy on both guitars and bass is in the harmonics though especailly first harmonic.  What you’re showing looks like the frequency resolution / FFT size isn’t high enough.  Run it through Audacity and tighten that up with a larger size and you probably wouldn’t be thinking you’re listening to sub-60 hz guitar solos.  

>> "This isn’t correct. Set Speakers = Large and Subwoofer = No. This sends LFE to the mains and subwoofer (using high level)"

This is typically just not true.  Some high end processors can be configured to do that but your typical low end receiver as stated simply does not automatically reroute the LFE channel to the mains.  Even if that were true, why on earth would you want to send powerful LFE signals to your mains?  For real.  Watch Blackhawk Down when the Irene scene comes on and you’re sending powerful 6 hz signals to the mains?  Powered by a cheap receiver?  Why on earth would you ever want to do that?  Why on earth would you want a receiver automatically doing that if you do not have a subwoofer?  You do not, that’s why it’s not done.  

That being said, if a 20 hz signal comes through your main channels, it’s going to send that 20 hz signal to your main channels which of course will get picked up by your sub.  But what it’s not going to do is reroute the LFE channel.  It gets thrown away.  So yes you can still get a decent amount of bass going on. That doesn’t mean it’s the LFE channel.  

Even if this happened, it would be mixed incorrectly.  LFE channel effects are supposed to be 10 db hotter than everything else.  There is no way to do this properly with a high level input.  

 

>> "Further subwoofer effect is mono. Directional (localizable) bass is retained using high level, or as Denon has done, they created ’directional bass’ for LFE to retain full range or high level performance."

The new Denons have four subwoofer outputs.  You’re not gaining what you think you’re gaining by using high level inputs from the mains.  It’s still sending bass that can be directional to where it needs to go.  The idea that if there's an explosion behind you, it's going to send it to the rear subs.  You do not need two high level input subs up front to take advantage of this like you think.  

@paducahhometheater 

Some high end processors can be configured to do that but your typical low end receiver as stated simply does not automatically reroute the LFE channel to the mains.

It's a basic function in receivers of all budgets. does setting speakers to large and subwoofer to no route LFE signal to the front speakers? - Google Search

 

Watch Blackhawk Down when the Irene scene comes on and you’re sending powerful 6 hz signals to the mains?  Powered by a cheap receiver?  Why on earth would you ever want to do that?

Answer: external amplifiers. Flagship receivers can also do a fine job. I'm not sure where 'low end' receiver or budget was mentioned.

 

Run it through Audacity and tighten that up with a larger size and you probably wouldn’t be thinking you’re listening to sub-60 hz guitar solos.

Here's a screenshot filtered below 100Hz. There's a fair amount of energy down there.

https://mega.nz/file/bV41SJAY#97HLq57ez-QNXwZ_6Bqt1zW7fG0ZktEUVB3vzjcQxkg

 

You can also play this 80Hz test tone in 2CH and disconnect the left speaker to see if you can localize it. If there are confusing room modes, stand in front of the right speaker and then stand in front of the left speaker. Then switch the audio to the left speaker and do the same. I believe the first thing you should notice is the SPL being more intense in the direction of the active speaker. The next thing you'll notice is the ability to localize the intensity of the vibration as you get closer to the source. 80 Hz clean pure sine wave BASS TEST TONE frequency

 

The new Denons have four subwoofer outputs.  You’re not gaining what you think you’re gaining by using high level inputs from the mains.

Just to clarify, I was referring to line level and bass being 'directional' as referenced in the song mentioned earlier. It's in reference to 2CH music using high level stereo vs line level mono.