Going from stock cords on my power amps to heavier gauge/better insulated cords made an audible difference. Replacing the stock cords on my Streamer, DAC and Preamp also made a difference, just not as dramatic.
My experience.
Yep, experienced the same thing in 1998-1999. I bought an Arcam Alpha 9 CDP.
I had read reviews on the CDP at the time. I checked the demo unit out from the dealer for a few days to hear how it sounded in my system. Going from memory Stereophile gave the Alpha 9 a B rating. I can’t remember what the reviewer said at the time. Going from memory he said the bass was a little loose and highs slightly strained, for a better word.
The power cord that came with the Alpha 9 was a cheapo 16/3 power cord. Not sure why ArCam supplied a grounding type power cord. The unit has double insulated power power wiring. No IEC ground prong.
I listened to the CDP for awhile using the power cord that came with the CDP. From listening to how the CDP sounded I was in agreement with the Stereophile Magazine review.
I kept thinking about that cheap power cord Arcam supplied with a $1500 CDP. (going from memory). I had the 14/3 OEM power cord that came my ARC tube amp I was no longer using. Boy did that power cord make a difference! The CDP has a max power usage rating of 20VA, 20 watts. 16/3 wire gauge was plenty big for 20 watts. 20W/120V = 0.166A. (Back panel lists 115V. 20W/115V = 0.17A) FWIW, ArCam used a massive size potted power transformer in the CDP... Why did Arcam do that? 20 watt load...
Bass was notably tighter and highs were extended, not strained.
Why an OEM larger gauge wire made a difference? Beats me. There is not any cable build geometry used. Just three conductors twisted spirally together covered by a jacket. Nothing special about the end electrical connectors.
Aftermarket audio grade power cords also made a difference in how the CDP sounded. I’ve never been a fan of shielded cables. Neither was the Arcam CDP.
.