What does "Warm" mean?


In his post today Paul McGowan ([email protected]) had a pretty good post on the subject of warmth.  Here is his definition: "The word usually points at a few related things. There's a slight rise in the lower midrange and upper bass — the region where male voices, cellos, lower piano notes, and the body of most instruments live. There's a softness at the very top, a rounding off of transient energy that feels easier on the ear over long sessions. And there's a sense of weight and body in the music, a presence that makes acoustic instruments feel three-dimensional rather than etched in air. When all three of those things show up together, listeners reach for "warm" because nothing else describes it as quickly."

Paul then goes on to discuss both the good and the bad of this set of characteristics.  In general I associate warmth with harmonic distortion, but prefer it to the stridency or harshness that I associate with intermodular distortion.  I think most people would agree.  Since we all live with a certain amount of distortion, more in analog than in digital playback, I wonder what others think about warmth, or lack of same, and their tolerance or lack of same in their own listening preferences. 

billstevenson

@billstevenson 

"What does "Warm" mean?"

Excessive amounts of intermodulation distortion from tube amps overdriven into speakers that are not sensitive enough. Tube amps sound fast, lively and crisp when matched to the right speakers and not "warm" and syrupy.

I believe it’s possible to have both warmth and analytical in the same system. 
in my system I have the highly analytical Benchmark DAC and amp combined with a classically warm vintage Conrad Johnson preamp.  I believe I have the best of both worlds.

@rvpiano when something is analytical, to me it's not warm. Maybe it's just semantics and I'd use the word "detailed"