A new measurement specification for speakers?


I am a dedicated low volume listener as my ears have become sensitive with age and past youthful abuse. I have been through a number of speakers with mixed results, trying to find one that sounds good at low volumes. Note that this is not my only criteria for speaker choice, but it ranks high. Frequently it is stated that high sensitivity speakers are good for low volume listening, but I feel there is no connection between the sensitivity rating of a speaker and how it plays at low volumes. 

Speaker sensitivity is typically measured in decibels produced with one watt of input using a 1 kHz tone with a microphone positioned at one meter from the speaker. Roughly useful for determining the kind of amplifier that might be required to drive the speaker, but not an indication of of how it will perform across the audible spectrum with one watt of input. 

For those who have owned or demo'ed a number of speakers, I think we are all aware that each speaker "opens up" at a certain level. By open up, I mean the sound becomes fuller across the spectrum. Good low volume listening speakers obviously open up at lower dB levels. 

What would be a proper means of measuring the level at which a speaker a speaker "opens up"? Technically, in my mind, this would be the dB level at which it delivers roughly linear sound across the audible spectrum, or some reasonable sub-range like 40-10,000 Hz. Call it Spectral Sensitivity. If we send a white noise signal using a select range or spectrum, at what dB level does the sound become linear, i.e. a (roughly) flat line on the graph. 

I am aware of Fletcher-Munson curves, but this does not apply, as we are not talking about human perception, only about the dB level at which the speaker produces the full spectrum of sound presented to it. 

I am not a speaker designer, and there are greater minds in this forum. Does something like this make sense?

zlone

Peter Walker of Quad recommended treating the volume control like the focus control on a camera.  Turn it until the music comes into focus.

Rather surprisingly, his big electrostatic panel speakers can be just as effective as near-field monitors.  Because they don't have conventional drivers, they do not suffer from 'stiction'.  They also simulate a point source of sound about a foot behind the panel, so are extraordinarily coherent.  

Their biggest disadvantage is that they don't like input voltages over 40-Volts, which should never occur at low volumes.

The difference is the way in which the mfg balanced their speaker and for what volume.

For example, a speaker that is "bass-heavy" will sound fuller at lower volume (so would "open up" sooner?) because it is compensating for the F-M hearing loss.  But this same speaker may then sound "tubby" or bass-heavy at a louder volume where the ear is more sensitive to it.

@toddalin the way I see it, amplifiers should be load invariant, many are not. Assuming they are, the speaker output should be consistent to its frequency response within its limits. If not, the room could be a factor.

So if the speaker is shown to be "bass heavy" at 1 watt, and this makes it sound "good to the ear" because it compensates for the F-M curve, and it is consistent to its frequency response across its power band, it will be "bass heavy," overpowering to the ear, at loud volumes.