Having set up a few Regas, most recently a P8, but P3 and P6 and Technics mostly SL1200 series, (and I own a GAE), plus in the past year using AnalogMagik on a few, let me say that I have a lot of respect for both companies. Regas tend to just flat work. They are speed accurate, dead on actually, as good as any DD. The difference as you go up the ladder is more refinement. Quiter, better bearings, better arms. They are not the best choice if you want to change cartridges, try different things, that is a disadvantage if you are so inclined. But, and this is a serious BUT, every time I have checked a Rega that had a Rega cartridge installed everything has been spot on. No adjustments required. They are optimized. So if you just want something that works, and you don't want to mess with it, Rega is tough to beat. And I'll tell you something else. They seem to hit way above expectation. That P8 I checked out was an easy match for my very carefully set up GAE that cost thousands more. So for the person with a first priority to play records, who wants to know that everything is set up correctly without having to mess with it, Rega is unique. If, on the other hand, the person is a hobbyist, who likes to try different cartridges, who wants to dive in and be involved with set up, Technics offers a very appealing line up. As I said above these are very, very, very, very good turntables, both.
Rega Planar 6 vs Technics SL-1200GR2 – Quality of Life Differences?
I’m planning a turntable upgrade and am down to two options: Rega Planar 6 and Technics SL-1200GR2. (Of course if there is anything under $2.5K that I am absolutely missing out on - used is perfectly fine,please let me know.)
I can find numerous P6’s for sale on the used market most without a cartridge (but that is a battle for another day) but would be purchasing the Technics new.
I’m already familiar with their general sonic reputations, so I’m less interested in “which sounds better” and more focused on real-world ownership and day-to-day use.
A few specific things I’d like input on from those who’ve lived with either (or both):
- User experience – Is one more “set it and forget it” while the other invites (or requires) more tweaking? This is a very important one for me.
- Setup & ease of use – Which is more straightforward out of the box (cartridge alignment, VTF, etc.)?
- Speed stability – Does the Technics’ quartz-locked direct drive translate into a meaningful real-world advantage vs the Rega belt system if you have been able to compare yourself?
- Maintenance / reliability – Belt changes vs long-term durability/service—what actually matters over time?
- Daily enjoyment – For someone who listens often but doesn’t want to constantly tinker, which is the more satisfying long-term ownership experience?
System context: Luxman 507z and Wharfedale Super Lintons, mostly rock and live recordings. I value strong emotional engagement, but also want something hassle-free to live with.
Would really appreciate perspectives from people with hands-on experience.
- ...
- 27 posts total
I would like to say thank you to everyone for their comments so far. I have had a lot to think about and I continue to think... One of the items also pushing me to move beyond the Sansui is the lack of tone arm lifter. I tried the Q-Lift and it did not work for me. I believe the Little Fwend will work with either the P6 or the GR2 so I consider that a sunk cost. Then part of me says get the Technics SL-1500CS with the lift at the end and just be done. Be happy for six months and just play records. Thanks!
|
@ctlesq, my perspective is similar to billstevenson's. I've never owned a Rega so can't offer anything on the sonic comparison. But your two choices approach design very differently so it seems to me each appeals to a different sort of hobbyist. By reputation the Rega is designed around rigidity with everything locked in place. That can be a good thing, but it eliminates the user's ability to fine tune adjustments. That appeals to many users. The Technics on the other hand is designed to allow the user to make several adjustments, including a wider choice of cartridges with their interchangeable headshell. Since both receive strong complements on their respective performance it seems the choice comes to more of which operational experience and flexibility the user is looking for. |
- 27 posts total