From my experience a well-recorded CD sounds better than SACD
You have an astonishing ability to generalise from your own highly biassed 'experience'.
The audio chain you listen to CDs on appears to be completely different to the one you use for SACDs, from the player on. If you contend that a well-recorded CD played through a very expensive DAC sounds better than SACD played through an ordinary AV system, most people would probably agree with you - at least if you only use two channels.
But take a well-recorded hybrid SACD and compare it with the CD layer on the same disk, played through the same audio chain where both are in their native mode (DSD versus PCM) and the improvement over CD can be astonishing.
I'll just note that for the price you paid for your 'digital' cable, you could have bought a universal disk transport (including Pure Audio Blu-ray and multi-channel SACD) and an additional HDMI cable.
I'll also note that the only way you can get native SACD output from your McCormack is via six analogue outputs for 5.1 or 2-channel sound. Trying to output SACD via S/PDIF can only be done with lossy conversion. No surprise CD sounds better if that is what you are comparing.
Please try to refrain from posting highly misleading generalisations based on personal observations from extremely poor experimental designs ![]()

