I assumed that the network packets were error corrected. But i haven't really looked into it. The dealer who sold me the streamer said that he had stored his CDs on a hard drive but streamed files from Qobuz sound just as good. He doesn't bother with his stored files. Anyway, over the next several weeks I will be able to evaluate Qobuz files against my CDs. Tomorrow, however, I will listen to a new (to me) mono vinyl album of Furtwangler conducting Beethoven's Ninth at Bayreuth.
Do I need an expensive digital cable?
I have been using a fairly inexpensive optical cable to connect my CD transport to my Moon 280D streamer. I was told that an SPDIFcoax cable would sound better. For an experiment I purchased an inexpensive Pangea coax cable. It didn't sound at all because its terminator ends did not fit snugly in my equipment. I consulted chatgbt who often gives me audio advice. It advised that for the short run of 1 meter, an RCA interconnect would work. It did. And sounded much better than the optical. Chatgbt said that RCA interconnect was good enough.
Now, there is a twist to this story that might make those doubters think twice. A digital cable carries packets of information that are rechecked to assure that the streamer is recieving correct information. There is the timing concern, though. But my Moon 280D has an asynchronous DAC with a clock as part of the DAC. Any information sent by my transport, whether it is clocked by the transport or not, will go through the Moon's asynchronous DAC's clock. So ;there shouldn't be a timing problem. Should there?
Can anyone make a case that I should buy a "better" coax cable?
- ...
- 279 posts total
- 279 posts total

