@mulveling Well said! FWIW, I buy a lot of records every year both new and used. Not including an estate record collection (~8,000) acquired last year, probably an average of 10-12 new records a month. In the past 5 years I can only recall one instance when I had to return a record as unacceptable. Perhaps you are correct and our expectations are lower. The records we are getting now are generally much, much better than the ones available when I bought my first records in 1960. I still have those records too, and all the ones bought between then and now. Oh yes there is a difference and yes I can still hear it.
@dogberry FWIW, I get around the full platter contamination problem on my VPI, basically the same issue you describe on your Loricraft, by using a microfibre cloth to wipe it off as I turn each record over. It is a minor issue anyway. For the benefit of others who might not know about these machines I offer the following. Another potential issue that you don’t have on the Loricraft is the potential for contamination on the surface of the record by the vacuum pickup tube during vacuuming. The Loricraft (and Monks) machines use a string that continuously passes between the the pickup tube and the record surface to prevent contamination. VPI uses felt lips that come in continuous contact with the record that pick up both the fluid and suspended debris off the records surface during drying. In consequence the VPI lips do get contaminated. The trade off is that the Loricraft is slower, but inherently cleaner. The solution for VPI users is a dedicated tooth brush or similar, which should be used after vacuum pickup on each side of each record.

