Interpretation


In classical music there can be  a plethora of performances of the same popular work, each one differing in interpretation and sound quality.  The question is which performance are you going to buy or stream? What are the criteria that will influence you? How important is sound quality?  Or Is interpretation your primary concern?  Of course the ideal is get a combination of both,  

I am in the midst of comparing complete sets of Mozart piano concertos and the old favorites such  as Brendel and Perahia are great but lacking in modern sound .So I find myself gravitating more towards later  good  interpretations in better sound 

So, which do you lean towards?

rvpiano

the sound of  bad recording in most case do not impede the perception of musical genius for musicians as well as for many among music lovers... The greatest genius i listened to on a plucked instrument is a Persian musician badly recorded, and this does not impede the perception of his genius...

Plucking (pizzicato) is not merely a technique; it is part of interpretation.  It is the violinist’s artistic choice, used to create meaningful expression when interpreting music—such as (1) where along the string to pluck, (2) how strongly to pluck, (3) how long the note is allowed to sustain or decay, (4) whether the character is playful or serious, (5) whether the gesture is rhetorical or mechanical, and (6) whether the pluck is executed with the bow or the fingers.  With less-than-ideal recordings, the subtle nuances and details of pizzicato—often critical to the musical interpretation—can be frequently veiled or masked.  With good modern recording equipment and techniques, these details and nuances can be accurately captured and faithfully reproduced.

I dont contest evidence... And what you just said is evidence...

But i claim bad recording of a musical genius on Tanbur do not impede our musical judgement and ectasy...

For sure i can dream of a better recording for him but sometimes we cannot have the cake and the icing too ...And compared to musical imagination sound recording is the icing not the cake...

 

Plucking (pizzicato) is not merely a technique; it is part of interpretation.  It is the violinist’s artistic choice, used to create meaningful expression when interpreting music—such as (1) where along the string to pluck, (2) how strongly to pluck, (3) how long the note is allowed to sustain or decay, (4) whether the character is playful or serious, (5) whether the gesture is rhetorical or mechanical, and (6) whether the pluck is executed with the bow or the fingers.  With less-than-ideal recordings, the subtle nuances and details of pizzicato—often critical to the musical interpretation—can be frequently veiled or masked.  With good modern recording equipment and techniques, these details and nuances can be accurately captured and faithfully reproduced.

 

 This recorded sound  in the background is bad or improvised cassette recording from a tent where the master was praying.. : 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jaw7eWzgWr0&list=RDJaw7eWzgWr0&start_radio=1

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCmJrSGX3W4&list=RDDCmJrSGX3W4&start_radio=1

The great violonist Yehudi menuhin said that listening in person to him was one of the greatest musical event in his life... I bought this album  30 years ago....

 

 

++++ But i claim bad recording of a musical genius on Tanbur do not impede our musical judgement and ectasy...

For sure i can dream of a better recording for him but sometimes we cannot have the cake and the icing too ...And compared to musical imagination sound recording is the icing not the cake...++++

Exactly!