"As far as micron particles in the groove, and the stylus with a high static pressure (stylus vertical tracking force divided by stylus surface area) causing the dust particle to be embedded in the groove, that is a very weak theory. The basic composition of the particle can be of almost any composition with the very worst be being silica (glass) type (Sahara sand), but most will just be pulverized under the pressure, if not just blown up like when you walk through very dry snow. Also, large particles are subject to kinetic energy from the impact with the stylus, and the basic equation is mass times velocity squared, so a large enough particle at the outer groove will cause a greater pop (where the velocity is 50 cm/s) than at the inner groove (25-cm/s)."
These are the most salient remarks of any passage posted in this thread since I’ve been following it.
Learning new term like "triboelectric series" and beating it like a dead horse as has been done here to rationalize your inaccurate assumptions, really isn’t very convincing. @mahgister went on a jag like this over the term "anthropomorphization" in his post in another thread like he invented the word, repeatedly, in every possible context that he thought was valid. To me it doesn’t make him seem any smarter.
You’re basically rambling on about a problem that doesn’t even really exist at least in the context you’re claiming it is. Antin’s statement above actually shines some light on the issue!
To quote what posted earlier upthread -
"The crackling you hear during playback is the result of surface contamination and groove damage due to improper handling or improper stylus maintenance or tonearm setup. The inevitable electrical charges that accumulate on the records surface do not affect the sound in any way."
"When the stylus encounters foreign matter as the record plays it pushes it out of the way."