Six DAC Comparison

@ saeed79

I’m sorry to hear that you had a bad experience with one of our DACs that you purchased used. 

There is most definitely something wrong with that DAC.

And nothing that we’ve ever had a customer report to us.

Though it is rare, over the past 15 years we’ve had some warranty repairs. 

The problem was always one or both channels being 100% dead.

We’ve never had a warranty repair where one channel was weak or bass was weak or some such. 100% dead or 100% working properly. 

We’ve had a few reports over the years of people who purchased one of our DACs from a 3rd party reseller like TMR who had an issue with them.

My guess is somebody messed with them who didn't know what they were doing. They could have adjusted the DAC chips MSB or op amps DC offset incorrectly. 

That being said, TMR is a very good company...I buy gear from them all the time.

But they don’t know how to properly test and adjust the fine-tune trim pots in our DACs.

BTW, with our new Z being released we’ve swapped out Zs for Xs with the various speaker companies who use our DACs in demos and at audio shows. 

Like most companies, on 1/1/26 we have to pay taxes on our inventory. 

We would rather give a customer a great deal than to pay taxes on those demo X’25 NC DACs.

If anyone is interested in a crazy low end-of-year price on a used or demo DAC please contact us.

Thank you all for the replies. I’ve started the return process with TMR, and they have been very helpful and understanding.

Regarding the DAC, I purchased it from eBay in the USA, and I am currently located in Saudi Arabia. I switched the internal voltage selector from 110V to 220V, so it’s possible that their testing did not reveal any issues when the unit was operating at 110V.

I measured the output myself, and the difference is very clear: there is a 4–5 dB channel imbalance between the left and right channels.

As for the sound, I couldn’t fully evaluate it due to the issue, but in terms of timbre it sounds very pleasing and colorful. It has the warmth of copper combined with the precision of silver. My current DAC lacks that level of precision, which is something I really appreciated with the Mojo.

I’m now considering the new Z model. My Mojo X is the AM version, I’m leaning toward the lower Fe model for more warmth and a softer bass attack. I’m wondering if this assumption is correct.

"I’m leaning toward the lower Fe model for more warmth and a softer bass attack. I’m wondering if this assumption is correct."

@saeed79 - 

From Mojo Audio’s website:

"With each choke upgrade you get more micro-details and micro-dynamics, a more ethereal top end, a more luscious midrange, more textured and tuneful bass, better musical flow, and more engaging emotional expression."

I have had all three types of chokes in Mojo Audio DACs and I wouldn’t argue with the conclusions presented by AI below.  I would also add that I found the amorphous chokes a worthwhile overall upgrade from ferrous core chokes while the choice between amorphous vs. nanocrystal chokes is more about personal preference.  For a more detailed explanation, you could always discuss this with Benjamin at Mojo Audio,  who has been open about the differences he hears.

From AI:

The core material affects how the power supply delivers current, which in turn influences the sonic presentation.

• Ferrous Core (Entry Level): This core provides more "gestalt and slam" to the sound, with a more energetic and exciting presentation. It has a robust, impactful sound, though some reviewers note it can be slightly less subtle or textured compared to the higher tiers.
• Amorphous Core (Upgrade): The amorphous core provides an intermediate step, offering more micro-details, micro-dynamics, and a more pronounced texture than the ferrous core. The sound has a slightly lower sine wave energy representation (per Mojo Audio’s analogy), which translates to more nuances and more refined textures in the audio reproduction.
• Nanocrystal Core (Top Tier): This is the top-of-the-line option and offers the greatest refinement. The nanocrystal core provides the most profound sound quality, with a very low noise floor that allows for subtle and complex harmonic details to become apparent. The sound is more relaxed, with better timing, tune, harmonic structure, and overall musical flow, leading to more engaging emotional expression. It provides the best resolution and the most natural timbre, bringing the listener closer to an analog, vinyl-like experience.

In summary, as you move from ferrous to amorphous to nanocrystal cores, the sound signature becomes less "digital" and more organic, with increased resolution, better harmonic coherence, and a more natural, emotionally engaging presentation. The fundamental energy remains the same, but it is delivered with greater texture and nuance with the advanced core materials. 

Hi,

I've had the Mojo Evo Pro for a long time, and although when I got it I thought it would be my endgame DAC (haha, right), over time I developed a little bit of a frustration with it. It was dense and thick and lush while also detailed. But...I developed the feeling that there was still something there between me and the music. One last remaining thin veil, if you will. 

I've always been a little bit of a detail/treble-head, and I decided it was probably my declining hearing now that I'm 52. I just couldn't pick up all the detail that I had loved so much before. Ah well, age sucks. 

Then, a couple weeks ago, I got my Mystique Z Quantum, and it kinda blew my mind. My first thought was, this thing is FAST. It's hard to explain to people how a DAC can be fast or slow, but I hope people here at least can understand. For a moment on that first day, I thought to myself, Did I turn up the playback speed by a few percent somehow? 

It also brought an incredible level of DETAIL. I had thought that my days of wallowing in glorious amounts of detail were behind me, but there it was again. (That does make me wonder, what would this DAC have sounded like before my hearing started to decline? Alas I'll never know.) But it's not fatiguing. I can (and do) listen for hours. Actually, that's not quite true: on the first day I thought it was just a little harsh. I was ready to borrow a solid state amp from a friend of mine so I could burn it in 24 hours a day until it smoothed out. But, the next day, I didn't feel like that at all. Yeah, it will certainly smooth out somewhat over the next few hundred hours or so, but now I don't feel like I need to rush that process. I enjoy it immensely as it is, and I will enjoy the process of it breaking in over time. I think my brain/auditory system just wasn't accustomed to receiving that much information, and it needed a night's sleep to get used to it. 

In the end, the Mystique Z just feels like that last remaining veil between me and the music has been lifted. Now it's right there. Nothing in between. In the past whenever I've upgraded something in my system I've enjoyed the process of going back and listening to all my favorites, to hear a better, improved interpretation of the recording. That is true to some extent with the Z, but it doesn't feel like a "better interpretation," it just feels like how the music was meant to sound all along. My system just wasn't capable of putting out that sound. Now it is. 

In the end, while the Evo Pro had a certain signature (the lushness and depth, at the expense of what I realize now was a little sluggishness), the Mystique Z doesn't really have a signature at all. Somewhere Benjamin Zwickel said that it's more "emotional" than his previous models, but I don't actually think that's true. It's neither "emotional" nor "clinical." It's just a perfectly polished lens onto the sound. 

@zachawry - I am glad you are enjoying your Mystique ZQ, and I am not surprised!  Leave it powered up and you should hear the same great sound whenever you decide to play your system.