Striking a balance between musicality and resolution


As my years and experience in this hobby continue to grow I notice a divergence between those seeking extreme resolution and detail from their music reproduction systems and those in search of maximum musicality.

In theory, high-end audio systems should provide more than garden variety stereo systems. In my view that means more detail and information should be heard from a high-end music reproduction system than one hears from ordinary HiFi stereo systems set ups. BUT is there such thing as too much resolution and detail in a stereo system’s sound presentation?

Some people feel that a less detailed presentation that is easier for your brain to process has better flow and provides more enjoyable listening.

So there is the dichotomy. Should one pay more to hear less? Can a frequency response performance that is curtailed at both frequency extremes be desired and praised?

Those that seek a “more musical” presentation usually point to their belief that that is how they hear live un-amplified acoustic music in the real world. In nature, high frequencies attenuate and decay with distance from the source and sound waves get absorbed, diffracted, reflected, and diffused by the environmental factors and landscapes; so they are not wrong in stating that in the real world the sound of music is less detailed and extended. The issue is that when we listen to our music reproduction systems at home we are not listening to live un-amplified music in a concert venue, but rather professionally produced audio recordings typically recorded with close-microphones techniques.

So the question is, do we want our systems to reproduce the sound on the commercial audio recordings accurately or does one want hear the sound the way one thinks that it should sound?

Lucky for me, I have enough systems at home that I have been able to design, set up, and tune them for different targeted resultant sound, sound presentation, and sound qualities. For instance, my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system is a dissecting microscope, my Pinnacle horn system aims at extreme musicality, and my WAAR reference system is a chameleon, which can be adjusted to sound exactly how you want it to sound in real-time.

My “test-bed” system takes on the sound character and sound qualities of the components in use and it is excellent for evaluating what new components have to offer or bring to the table in terms of sound qualities. But with the Acapella TW-1S ION plasma super-tweeters extending the high frequencies, the TBI Emperor subwoofers extending the low frequencies, and the highly detailed & nuanced Digital Audio Denmark AX24 DSD dac streaming HQPLAYER as the source, the “Test Bed” system is a highly resolving system.

As with everything else in life, is there a happy medium or compromise that gives you the best of those worlds? I believe that there is and that great music reproduction systems can be tuned to strike a balance between musicality and resolution. If one listens to the evolution of my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system for instance you can hear that the fine tuning is driving the sound in that direction.

So during last night’s listening session I adjusted the sound of my “Test Bed” system to a more musical sound presentation. The “Test Bed” system is always in flux so it allows me to experiment, explore, tweak, tune, and have fun with it.

Here is an audio recording from last night’s listening session that captures the revised sound presentation and conveys the sound qualities that exemplify a more organic sound versus a more delineated & resolved sound presentation:
 

The Way It Goes

 

carlos269
Post removed 

@jjss49 that’s wonderful to hear. Please share and post some audio recordings of your system or someone else’s high level system, it doesn’t have to be your own if yours doesn’t exhibit these qualities, that has tons of musicality and resolution in spades as examples. I’m curious to listen to a few examples of these systems, especially yours if it has these qualities. Please share some examples of such systems so that we can all listen to and assess what you consider high level systems that don’t compromise between musicality and resolution. I look forward to listening to the audio recordings, they can even be embedded in videos uploaded to YouTube that is fine. Again thank you for providing such choice examples of no compromise high level systems for us to listen to and hear what you consider no compromise between musicality and resolution.

It is a real trade-off born from acoustics ignorance or gear design focus at the price of forgetting the acoustics and psycho-acoustics parameters at play...

In this sense it become a "false" trade-off but for high-end systems in acoustically controlled room for specific ears (psycho-acoustics parameters ).

 for high level systems, no ’balance’ is needed... you have both in spades, it is a false tradeoff

 

 

 
 

 

 

carlos,

Do you really believe that the volume of the sound has no impact on the frequency balance and distortion of a microphone?

Have you never heard a recording where the singer gets too close and this changes the tonality or even audibly distorts?

Don’t you think that the louder recording has an advantage as to background noise?

When I try to play your recording back at what I perceive to be about the same level, I hear audible difference and this is just something else to muddy the waters because it is potentially a cause.

IIRC, YouTube also has optimum levels for the best recordings.