Graphene infused OCC conductor

And this from NASA:

https://techport.nasa.gov/projects/93595

And this from a Science site of sorts:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008622321003699

And this research paper.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.deanfrancispress.com/index.php/te/article/download/2549/2586&ved=2ahUKEwiuq8ChkqmRAxVQnGoFHdc-ONk4ChAWegQILxAB&usg=AOvVaw3a3wGqy6ndlSmJPZcYwRiB

@winoguy17 ,

Your response to me makes no sense.

How is my post on the use of the word graphene and your post about liking the sound of Cerious cables even remotely related to each other? Plus, the way your last response reads, it was clearly a shot at me. Not that I'm devastated or anything, I just find it odd as the two comments are completely unrelated. Your response infers I'm commenting about the sound of the cable without hearing it, while you have real world experience with it, hence making my post irrelevant.

Yeah, A bit of a head scratcher.

@foggyus91 ,

I never dismissed graphene as a superior conductor. That is a fact that it is.

But it’s still a technology the can’t be produced on a scale to have real world benefits yet as there are still a lot of hurdles to jump to get it there.

I reiterate:

Any audio company stating the use of real graphene by any method is marketing voodoo, regardless of how good the product is.