Striking a balance between musicality and resolution


As my years and experience in this hobby continue to grow I notice a divergence between those seeking extreme resolution and detail from their music reproduction systems and those in search of maximum musicality.

In theory, high-end audio systems should provide more than garden variety stereo systems. In my view that means more detail and information should be heard from a high-end music reproduction system than one hears from ordinary HiFi stereo systems set ups. BUT is there such thing as too much resolution and detail in a stereo system’s sound presentation?

Some people feel that a less detailed presentation that is easier for your brain to process has better flow and provides more enjoyable listening.

So there is the dichotomy. Should one pay more to hear less? Can a frequency response performance that is curtailed at both frequency extremes be desired and praised?

Those that seek a “more musical” presentation usually point to their belief that that is how they hear live un-amplified acoustic music in the real world. In nature, high frequencies attenuate and decay with distance from the source and sound waves get absorbed, diffracted, reflected, and diffused by the environmental factors and landscapes; so they are not wrong in stating that in the real world the sound of music is less detailed and extended. The issue is that when we listen to our music reproduction systems at home we are not listening to live un-amplified music in a concert venue, but rather professionally produced audio recordings typically recorded with close-microphones techniques.

So the question is, do we want our systems to reproduce the sound on the commercial audio recordings accurately or does one want hear the sound the way one thinks that it should sound?

Lucky for me, I have enough systems at home that I have been able to design, set up, and tune them for different targeted resultant sound, sound presentation, and sound qualities. For instance, my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system is a dissecting microscope, my Pinnacle horn system aims at extreme musicality, and my WAAR reference system is a chameleon, which can be adjusted to sound exactly how you want it to sound in real-time.

My “test-bed” system takes on the sound character and sound qualities of the components in use and it is excellent for evaluating what new components have to offer or bring to the table in terms of sound qualities. But with the Acapella TW-1S ION plasma super-tweeters extending the high frequencies, the TBI Emperor subwoofers extending the low frequencies, and the highly detailed & nuanced Digital Audio Denmark AX24 DSD dac streaming HQPLAYER as the source, the “Test Bed” system is a highly resolving system.

As with everything else in life, is there a happy medium or compromise that gives you the best of those worlds? I believe that there is and that great music reproduction systems can be tuned to strike a balance between musicality and resolution. If one listens to the evolution of my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system for instance you can hear that the fine tuning is driving the sound in that direction.

So during last night’s listening session I adjusted the sound of my “Test Bed” system to a more musical sound presentation. The “Test Bed” system is always in flux so it allows me to experiment, explore, tweak, tune, and have fun with it.

Here is an audio recording from last night’s listening session that captures the revised sound presentation and conveys the sound qualities that exemplify a more organic sound versus a more delineated & resolved sound presentation:
 

The Way It Goes

 

carlos269

As I’ve said, rather than transport the room to the venue, I transport the venue to the room and live with it’s acoustics.

The room is actually pretty bad (sucks the midrange out like a sponge) and I’ve made the speakers work with it.  I just wish that you people could hear the soundstage and imaging, which are the best I’ve heard, and I’ve been to T.H.E. Show and the CES.

You have done a good job... The room do not appear so  bad through the recording only acoustically  uncontrolled but on the neutral side to me..

Anyway the sound is very good..

As I’ve said, rather than transport the room to the venue, I transport the venue to the room and live with it’s acoustics.

The room is actually pretty bad (sucks the midrange out like a sponge) and I’ve made the speakers work with it.  I just wish that you people could hear the soundstage and imaging, which are the best I’ve heard, and I’ve been to T.H.E. Show and the CES.

how do you explain that I’m able to achieve great sound on my audio recordings of my systems shared on YouTube and you cannot achieve even good audio quality on your system’s audio recordings? What do you think accounts for those differences?

One obvious and very answer is the YT sound isn't that of the room at all. 

That's one of the many problems with YT; you simply have no idea of what's actually being played or if you're the one being played. 

@atmasphere that is one of the benefits of having the visual aspect of the video. It shows the system being recorded and from what location the recording is being made. Of course someone can always cheat and embed some other audio on the video but what does that gain the person who uploaded or shared a doctored audio recording? Nothing really; as you have seen not many audiophiles value audio recordings when embedded in videos.

People use all types of equipment, like the guy, Josh I believe at Believe in High Fidelity, who is using ultra expensive professional studio microphones and high-end studio equipment to try to get an edge but to me the sound of his audio recordings/videos isn’t that impressive. So not sure the extra time, effort, and expense really gained him that much than if he would have simply made a simple recording with a portable recorder, phone, or camera.

Then you have people like Michael Fremer who will post audio recordings/videos of his system recorded directly from the output of the phonostage. That is not the same as a system’s audio recording recorded from the listening position.

The best way to hear or listen to find out if there is any shenanigans is to listen for the room contributions in the audio recordings because no matter how small they are there is always a slight trace.

People can always find a way to cheat but those that do are only fooling themselves.