Retired IT here too. Started working with network packets from banks and retail back in the 80's. Totally agree with your conclusion. And the amount of jitter in today's DACs is consistently shown to be far below the level of human audibility.
bits is bits
Being a retired IT tech, Iʻm a "bits is bits" guy. I keep seeing people rank different streaming services against each other and I have to say, Iʻm mystified. Modern recordings are all digital masters and remastered. If two different hi-res streaming services, say Qobuz and Tidal, have the same track available, why would one sound different from the other, let alone better?
The stream is being fed over TCP/IP from the source, and I see no reason that it you were to do a cksum on the same file/track being delivered by either streaming service, that they would exactly match. So why do people claim better sound from one streaming source over the other. Iʻm assuming they are both full resolution sources, not mp3.
- ...
- 109 posts total
@grunge1000 The question should be, why don't identical files sound the same? What you're saying is technically correct, but not in practical application. The files alone don't produce/make or project actual music that is audible to your ears through your audio system. It's just a file that's just sitting there. It's the implementation of the file that makes it sound different sourced through various different sources, Streaming services, etc., who do not use identical equipment, engineering to covert the file into audible music. Consider a CD a music file. Play the same CD through 10 different CD players, or sources, and you'll get a different sound from the same CD just about every time. Happy listening.
|
- 109 posts total

