Why hasnt a turntable manufacturer produced a table with automatic tonearm return/shutoff?


I'm listening to my old Technics 1700 turntable, which has the tonearm return/ shutoff mechanism. It's one of the reasons I don't upgrade. The idea that you have to get up to retrieve the cartridge and turn off the machine makes little sense when the technology has been there for years. I know the issue of the mechanism introducing sound into the table, but it seems to me that the mechanism can be isolated and kept off until the record ends. What gives?

kavakat1

I worked at a well-known U.S. turntable manufacturer for a few years.   (A) there was shockingly little demand/ask for it, (2) and for those that wanted it, we’d add an AudioTechnica 6006 or Tru-Lift or similar add-on unit.   We even carried them at the factory.    I can count (maybe on one hand) the number of them I sold with new tables in a few years’ time.   And, that’s just the “lift” — no auto-shutoff.   So, from an engineering perspective, near-zero demand = a feature that’s not worth the effort (as far as being integral to the table).  It’s really just that simple.   It’s always been a staple of the Japanese tables (and some others) but never truly caught on with U.S. audiophiles.    I literally had the privilege of speaking at length with thousands of audiophiles about their analog systems, and it was ever-so-rare that anyone would ever bring it up.   
 

Jim 

The old record players played a stack of records automatically. I had a 45 rpm record player in my hot rod that played a stack too , only skipped on big bumps. Later on I got a Thorens player with a Rabco arm which was some improvement. The first time I heard a c.d. I sold the record player and never looked back. Nowadays I have a high end SACD one bit player. In my opinion no record can hold a candle to it. I don't get the record thing but whatever floats your boat.

It was always my understanding that any type of additional mechanation or masses added to the tone arm would/could bring additional methods for coupling noise and possibly affecting proper tracking.

@soundman406 

any type of additional mechanation or masses added to the tone arm would/could bring additional methods for coupling noise

Would that argument not also apply to lowering devices, which are attached to the arm base?

Surely end-of-side can be detected in a non-contact way, for example by interrupting a light beam.  These days, even toasters have little motors to raise the crumpets!

I sometimes wish I had something that just raised the arm from the run-out groove.  If a stylus has say 400 hours life, I'd rather keep it for playing music.  Happy for the table to still run

 

I took one look at the Bang & Olufsen Beogram 4004 in 1978 and knew I had to own it.  I loved the appearance and I loved the tangential tracking tonearm.   But through all the years I owned it I was subtly reminded that it wasn’t an audiophile’s turntable..  So in 2013 I succumbed to the subtle pressure of my fellow audiophiles and I bought a Rega RP40 Anniversary Edition Turntable and an Audio Note phono stage and I had to get used to carefully putting down the tonearm and getting up to lift it when the recording had finished.   I guess you could say I was completely spoiled because I so hated having to do that.  In 2022 I brought out my old Beogram. 4004 and had it completely restored by Beolover and I’m back to being happy playing vinyl again.  And I sold my Rega and Audio Note with zero regrets.