Russbutton describes an active crossover providing signal to an amplifier for each driver. For a three driver speaker, three separate amps required. Six amps total for a typical 2 channel system. That is increased complication. In no way is replacing a passive crossover with that an equal exchange. Numerous paths to problems include more connection points, more cabling, higher parts count=less reliable, multiple paths for EMI/RFI, matching amps to drivers, level adjustment for each driver to name a few. The power transfer from amp to each driver is not vastly improved. A passive crossover does not consume unreasonable power as has been implied either.
No doubt Class D amps will be recommended. This recommended path is supposed to produce superior sound quality, right. Six cheap Class D amps are the exact opposite of quality and reliability. Better have a couple spares on hand at all times.
If an individual wishes to pursue active crossover, DSP, multiple amps, etc. that is just as acceptable as improving a passive crossover. However, fact is the active path is not as simple or vastly superior as the claims made in this thread. Pick your poison.

