Do you know the difference between a "rambling diatribes" and an argument conceptually detailed ?
read my post above they clarify the simplistic claim of hilde45 about confirmation biases and the true definition with two different sources...
Then you claim to avoid me, OK, do you avoid rational argument too answering a simplistic claim ?
Do not lie, you DO NOT AVOID ME, you came uninvited for example in the thread "the mystery of sound is mysticism " where you never posted any positive contribution expressely to derail the thread with sarcasms , and this after i posted 6 articles and information about a book describing a very important acoustic revolution right now confirmed by two set of experiments for the benefit of all audiogon readers, you insulted me instead of thanking me and harassed my posts with no arguments only useless sarcasms..
Actually, @mahgister , I do not "trail you in all threads." I try to avoid you. It just so happens that I commented in this thread prior to your rambling diatribes, so maybe you are trailing me?
Then this post of you is not the result of a confirmation biases against me , it is a flat upright lie...
Idiot do not have shame ...