Modded CD Player or Stock CD Player?


I am starting this thread in the hope of starting an active and productive discussion on recent experiences folks have had with regard to trying modded digital front ends versus stock front ends. I suggest the criteria for comparison include such things as:

1. Price Performance – “bang for the buck”
2. Reliability,
3. Other factors people use to assess each option,

[So you have a reference point on my system it now consists of all solid state electronics and very revealing speakers as follows...

1. Modded Denon 3910 (Hot Rod Audio Mods) and Stock Cambridge 840C front ends,
2. Soundstring interconnects,
3. Classe CP-60
4. Classe CAM 200 monoblocks
5. Soundstring speaker cables
6. Dynaudio C1 speakers on Dynaudio stands]

My own digital front end experience is likely similar to many others as I first encountered CD players in 1984 (a college friend had a NAD player and we were all a bit envious and in awe of him and his pop and hiss free format playing a rather expensive Police Synchronicity CD). After graduating I bought a near first generation Rotel player in 1986, followed by a used Sonographe that I kept until it died in 2001. I had a Rotel 971 for a while that was replaced by a better sounding (the technology keeps improving) Cambridge 840C that is now sonically upstaged by a modded Denon 3910. The move to a modded player was brought on by an interest in DVD-Audio and SACDs. I have a revealing enough system that the stock Denon was hard to listen to on Hi Rez recordings. The Denon used to sound awful on redbook also, but the modded Denon has a sound that is more detailed than the Cambridge AND a lot smoother like a very good analogue.

I am holding off completing my assessment on reliability as it has only been a few months, but so far so good. The performance has been outstanding and the price comparable (I got my stock Denon player at a discount) to the stock Cambridge CD player. The Cambridge is no slouch – I am keeping it as a back up and also would likely have it modded at a later date.

What are other people’s experiences with modded units versus stock?
ryanvt
Modded = best sound for your buck and worst return on your investment. If you buy used modded, you can try several diferent units if you feel the need and have minimal risk on resale.
Post removed 
But remember if you elect to go used there might be a wait. Some modded players (like the TRL) rarely come up for sale. The used market is far from perfect, so patience is the key.
So far it seems the majority opininion is that modded is THE way to go, and the price you pay is reduced resale value over stock. That said, you may be less inclined to upgrade as often, so your trade up costs may be less of a negative. It will be interesting to see if any later posts counter the "modded trumps stock" feeling the threads show so far.
Nmuntean,

Well, the background is quieter (I went from level 4+ to 6, I believe) frequency extremes are more present, the player is fuller, not quite as "digital" and overall more realistic. It is hard to say exactly the full extent of the upgrades, as I had nice components at the time, but as I have upgraded my amplification (first to a SMC-modded DNA-125 and Dehavilland pre, then to a super nice Karan integrated, and now back to the DNA-125 and an SMC modded preamp (best yet in my system) the digital playback just keeps getting better and better. When I first heard the upgrade done, it was noticeably better, but the differences are even more pronounced as my system improves around it. I am pretty much sold on upgraded pieces at this point, between my SMC units, the VSE Sony, and Modwright and GNSC stuff I have tried in the past.

Did you see the new clock upgrade? the internal unit is fairly affordable at $600. If you took your system to full Level 7, it would cost you less than $1000, and sound wise, if it is indeed a step up over the level 6, is going to sound spectacular.