Reel to reel

Agree with many before stated including the new tapes.

I recently took a plunge into R2R.
Ended up with a professionally and fully restored Otari mX5050. These decks are really great as they can run three speeds (3.75, 7.5 and 15 ips - slowest needs to be switched on the back; mine has an added opening so its easy). I also lucked out getting an AKAI 630DB with 20+ vintage reels, mostly TDK, Maxell (some Scotch and Fuji). Some of the tapes are excellent. The Akai was a bargain vs the Otari, but it plays very nicely and sounds great. There is a LOT of information out there and some decks from TEAC, Otari and Technics (1500, 1700 etc) are really great IF fully restored. It will cost you but you will be appreciating the format better and will enjoy your recordings tremendously.

One has to spend extra time on learning how to properly clean (frequently) the tape path, demagnetization, and investing in reels, tape (new tape comes in a pancake without reels). I prefer metal reels, which can be bought old and new but very costly.

Prerecorded tape, esp 15ips is very expensive, usually several times the price of new pressing LP.

Enjoy the ride - i am (and the R2R resurrected my cassette decks too)  

I used to have a Tandberg 6000X and then a Revox 77 and loved them back in the 70s. But I can't imagine anyone going open reel in 2019 unless they like the toy factor. Tape breaks, it is difficult to load, the machine is expensive to fix and has maintenance issues, head cleaning--all a nuisance. Then there is tape hiss. It's the 21st century my friend! 

I don't have "tape hiss"; evidently you were not doing proper maintenance, or bought cheap tape.

I had an AKAI that had all the problems you stated "double", but my Technics RS 1500, has been major trouble free for the last 20 years. It's been calibrated and I do maintenance frequently; clean heads, de-magnetize, and clean rollers with rubber cleaner.

With good tape, no turntable can compare; and the funny thing is, I record from the TT, and LP's sound so much better; I could write an entire page describing the improved playback, but I wont; especially since there are so many who state this is impossible.

As soon as I finish this post, I'm going to indulge in 15 IPS playback.

So long, and may the force be with you.

Here is an open letter of apology to AKAI buyers and owners; the model I had was a cheap bad one that I would not have bought if I knew what I was doing; AKAI makes better models.

orpheus 10
I could write an entire page describing the improved playback, but I wont; especially since there are so many who state this is impossible.

It is not impossible orpheus 10 for your particular situation.

When you are recording "punching" tapes you are using IEC or NAB EQ. Which EQ is it? Also remember when you are "punching" tape you are setting levels to the peak (this is important-come back to it) with NAB or IEC EQ, and playing them back on your own machine, same heads, same EQ, same levels. This is important.

Our records are cut - recorded- with RIAA Eq (treble boost/bass cut) Our phono stage puts an inverse RIAA EQ on them when you play them. The question remains for each of us - how well matched is our set up for playing back these records, since none of us are using the same type of machine that cut them. Different carts, different cart settings, different gains.....

Are each of using the best gain, cart setting when playing back records ?

orpheus 10
If you are telling us that your tape copies (high level signal) sound better, than the source LP - (low  level signal) - LP - in your room/ system; then it simply IMO indicates improvements can be made to your vinyl setup.

But hey, it sounds like you are having fun doing what you are doing, and you prefer tape, so I don’t see this happening any time soon.
That’s fine too.

A better comparison for you would be to acquire some Master dubs of actual albums you own, compare them to your lps to determine how big the delta really is.

Cheers