As with all things audio, generalizations are well.....generalizations.
For example, I've found that my Soundlab electrostatic speakers are better controlled and produce deeper more controlled bass when using CAT or Atma-sphere tube amplification vs Mark Levinson, Parasound and Pass Labs solid state amplification. When first inserted, the CAT's control and bass abilities were quite profound and instantaneously recognizable. Now, that's not to say a solid state wouldn't be better, simply because I've never heard one that is. In the scheme of things, I've heard very few amps with my speakers.
The ss vs tube question is such a difficult one because the variables are so unlimited -- i.e. dozens, if not 100's of applicable ss amps, an equal or greater number of pre-amps, cables and front ends. Which supports my generalization point. I've found tubes to work with my speakers. But a ss amp may work equally as well or better. I just haven't found one yet. So the tube vs ss question is NOT one that is easily answered, or in my mind, really relevant.
But an electrostatic speaker's amplification needs are different than a cone and dome speaker's needs. With different speakers and even different models of the aforementioned solid state amplifiers, the results could have been different; hence my point about generalizations.
So, with any certainty, unfortunately, it's impossible to generalize about the use of a tube pre-amp as opposed to a ss pre-amp coupled to a ss amp or even a tube amp.
I can understand your question, because I've been there many times. But until I auditioned a CAT JL1 amplifier against my Mark Levinson 336 ss amp, and Parasound JC1 monoblocks, I too wouldn't had thought the difference would be so dramatic. Now, I may have simply run into a tube amp that was different from the pack. The CAT having house-wound 55lb transformers in each monoblock, certainly makes a difference. Whose to say that sort of design decision doesn't significantly blur the tube vs ss generalized differences. Which brings up the fact that I believe the designer and design is more important than the amplification path (ss vs tubes) that is chosen.
I guess what I'm saying is you not only need to try a tube pre-amp, you need to try several dozens of pre-amp brands in order to judge what tubes do in your system's case. If you picked several different tube and ss pre-amps, you may be surprised to find that the difference between them based solely on their design (tubes vs ss), isn't as easily discernible as they are oftentimes generalized to be.
For example, I've found that my Soundlab electrostatic speakers are better controlled and produce deeper more controlled bass when using CAT or Atma-sphere tube amplification vs Mark Levinson, Parasound and Pass Labs solid state amplification. When first inserted, the CAT's control and bass abilities were quite profound and instantaneously recognizable. Now, that's not to say a solid state wouldn't be better, simply because I've never heard one that is. In the scheme of things, I've heard very few amps with my speakers.
The ss vs tube question is such a difficult one because the variables are so unlimited -- i.e. dozens, if not 100's of applicable ss amps, an equal or greater number of pre-amps, cables and front ends. Which supports my generalization point. I've found tubes to work with my speakers. But a ss amp may work equally as well or better. I just haven't found one yet. So the tube vs ss question is NOT one that is easily answered, or in my mind, really relevant.
But an electrostatic speaker's amplification needs are different than a cone and dome speaker's needs. With different speakers and even different models of the aforementioned solid state amplifiers, the results could have been different; hence my point about generalizations.
So, with any certainty, unfortunately, it's impossible to generalize about the use of a tube pre-amp as opposed to a ss pre-amp coupled to a ss amp or even a tube amp.
I can understand your question, because I've been there many times. But until I auditioned a CAT JL1 amplifier against my Mark Levinson 336 ss amp, and Parasound JC1 monoblocks, I too wouldn't had thought the difference would be so dramatic. Now, I may have simply run into a tube amp that was different from the pack. The CAT having house-wound 55lb transformers in each monoblock, certainly makes a difference. Whose to say that sort of design decision doesn't significantly blur the tube vs ss generalized differences. Which brings up the fact that I believe the designer and design is more important than the amplification path (ss vs tubes) that is chosen.
I guess what I'm saying is you not only need to try a tube pre-amp, you need to try several dozens of pre-amp brands in order to judge what tubes do in your system's case. If you picked several different tube and ss pre-amps, you may be surprised to find that the difference between them based solely on their design (tubes vs ss), isn't as easily discernible as they are oftentimes generalized to be.