Why people says SE is better PP

I built OTL 6AS7 GE & ECC81 and it is my favorit. In OT amps sound and the bass are defined by quality of OT. How sound the amp deppends how sound the OT /the best OT is missing/.About PP and SE. Crossing of the signal 0 between upper and down sholders of PP cause sharp and metal sound, that people define like detail sound. 

I built SE EL11 Telefunken, SE UL EL84 Funkwerk Germany and PP QQE03/12 Tesla, with 8 icn fullranges connected to12 inch bass speakers. If someone is interesting, he can visit me and listen these amps and we can continue conversation.

Id like to change the discussion....What it should it not contain the tube amp? IMO, NFB that press the scene of the sound sending the part of signal back into the previouse stage. Unique amp must be built lineary without NFB. IMO, never use tone control that change the sound. If You need more bass, put big bass speaker, if You need more high freeq. - put sensitivity tweeters, if You need meedle fr. - put sensitivity fullrange not less 8 inch. IMO, Hi End is back proportional to the number of composite parts - use simple decisions with not cheep parts. Every passive part change the sound. IMO, in SE iron for OT must be 10-20 time more than output power, /for 5 W never use 5 W OT/. IMO, in power supply use kenotrones, that provide soft start and soft amazing sound. Every time use iron chock and hmmm will be far from Your ears. IMO, do not use iron enclosure that collect noises....But your opinions?

I built and listen every time SE EL11 Telefunken in triod with EBF11 Telefunken in triod - 1.5 W and I think  this output tube is the best for all times - only brand Telefunken - made from Valvo, Telef. didnt make tubes.!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxIweBK6vlU
My big SE GK71 & 6P15P /Russian/ - prototype