Using Bad Recording to Evaluate a System


Once I went to a dealer to audition a speaker, brought a few CD's. One of them was a CD of a group I like but has rather low quality recording.
Well, I put that CD in and cued up a track, and when the music ended the dealer asked why I was using such a horrible sounding recording to audition. (I think he looked kinda slightly pissed. Maybe because the music sounded shrill and irritating the whole time???)
Yeah, why?
Here's what I think: an audio system should make listening the music a pleasant experience. The better your system can reproduce, the more enjoyment you get regardless of recording quality. Saying that 'my system is so good I can only play my audiophile discs' is basically saying something is wrong with my system. Yes, nowadays I tend to play my 'audiophile' CDs much more than regular ones, but that's because of the music AND the excellent recording quality, but when I play my regular or lower recording quality CD's, I find that, although the shortcomings are more obvious, my system can reproduce the music as an enjoyable presentation, and I enjoy it more than when I used to in prev. lower-res/quality/musicality systems.
yr44

Showing 1 response by onemug

Yr44, I like your method. I assume besides the 1 bad CD you also take a good one. For me, the music has to serve me. I don't want to be limited to Rebecca Pidgeon/Spanish Harlem/Chesky or the like. The best 2 words I could use to describe my taste would be "relaxed detail". I think someone could write a story about Goldilocks and the three stereo systems. This one is too bright, this one is to dark, etc. We all go for the middle one in regards to our own ear. Even if I thought yours was the brighter one, I bet we could make it brighter or darker but it's in the middle for you and that's all that counts. Viva la difference! Good luck.