Two Stereo Amps, Bi-amp or Monoblock?


From what I have seen, the normal step-up from a bridgeable stereo amp is to buy another and use them in monoblock format. You could however buy another and leave them in stereo and simply use one amp for both channel tweeters and one amp for both channel woofer/midrange. I understand that this is not a full 4 monoblock bi-amp configuration, but I wonder if the bi-amp advantage is glimpsed to a large extent in this format and perhaps a better sonic improvement over running the two amps in monoblock. Thoughts or experiences? Aside from sonic benefits of either, what is the resulting power increase from the two formats? In the "bi-amp" format you would also have the ability (or advantage) to offer a different amp to the tweeters and to the woofer/midrange; whereas in the monoblock you would need to match the amps.
wheeler

Showing 1 response by dan_ed

I went through this bridged/biamping decision within the last few months. I had started by bridging my two Rotel 980BX's into a pair of Totem Rokk's. Obviously I didn't need the power for these speakers, but I wanted to see what difference shortening the speaker leads would make. I started with an old shotgun set of 10' XLO cables and clipped them down until I had about 4, 18" leads. I could distinctly hear an improvement in the details of the music.
Not long ago I swapped out the Rokk's for a pair of Aerial 10t's. These do need the power, but more importantly, they need the current. So after a few hours of listening at modest volume levels, I switched back to stereo mode and horizontally biamped which required using the other 7' of the XLO's. The details were still there, the bass improved, and I can turn up the volume more without the fear of clipping and damaging the 10t, which are worth far more than the amps.