SCD-1 Questions...


#1 I've heard some mention that the XLR outputs use cheap opamps and are inferior to the RCA outputs. What's the consensus on this?

#2 What's up with the little metal plate that can be unscrewed from the back panel to allow a switch to be moved to the "custom" mode position as opposed to "standard" mode? The manual says that flipping the switch can cause system damage. I use a McIntosh MA-6900 integrated amplifier and Vandersteen 3A speakers.
gthrush1

Showing 3 responses by ghostrider45

To Wally_li:

Yes, that works, but then it screws up your other sources that have opposite polarity. Better to solve this at the source, if possible.
#1 - Don't know how cheap the op amps are, but the SCD-1 is not digitally balanced so the balanced outs are not intrinsicly superior to the single ended outputs. Also, the balanced outs use the Japanese standard for pin connections (hot and cold are on opposite pins from the US standard), so you will invert absolute polarity when connecting to a US standard balanced input. You can fix this by making up a special balanced cable that swaps the hot and cold pins internally.

#2 - The DSD process uses lots of noise shaping that generates much ultrasonic hash above 50 khz or so (I'm doing this from memory, so may be off a bit on numbers). The default position of the switch engages a filter that rolls off the output above 40 khz or so. Removing this filter (by changing the switch position) seems to open up the sound a bit. I guess there is some small risk to your tweeters.

BTW, I don't think that the XA777ES has this switch - I wonder if it has a non defeatable filter.
Stehno is right about the new version of the SCD-1 using the American standard for the XLR pinout - just checked my owner's manual. I just read in the reviews that the connections were reversed and never checked firsthand.

I usually invert the polarity on my preamp by default to "correct" when listening to the SCD-1, and often found myself flipping back to normal. I wondered why so many SACD's were recorded "inverted." Now I know the truth!

Good catch!