Satellite or CATV?


Assuming an excellent signal, which has the better video and audio? I use CATV mainly because my internet service also comes in on the same line, and I conveniently use a simple splitter. Any comments on channel selection and monthly cost as well? Thanks.
blueswan

Showing 1 response by erider

I understand your situation, I was in an identical situation a few months ago and this is what I did -

I had the Time-Warner "Analog" cable replaced with Dish Network in my house. I was disgusted with the quality of cable and their frequent underhanded price increases. In a previous house I had a full size (10') satellite dish which was an enormous improvement over cable.

Much to my surprise I found that the quality of the signal from Dish Network was not significantly better than the analog signal I received from my cable provider. Even the installers who came repeatedly to "fix" the Dish Network signal agreed and eventually gave up. The quality was apparent in all the televisions in my house but most obvious on the 100" Stewart screen/ CRT projector I own. The problems are typically greater degree of color bleed, loss of sharpness, signal strength, black level etc.

I am still living with the satellite system because of the variety of programming it offers. Just few of the channels make it worthwhile to go the Dish Network route such as National Geographic Channel, Worldlink TV, History Channel etc. but don't expect a tremendous improvement in quality. I, for one, did not get it.

FYI, I have four separate receivers (including a PVR) wired with high quality Belden video cable. There are no splitters in my system.

IMO, yes Dishnetwork is better than cable but a full size satellite dish beats the pants off both. I should know, I have had all three at one time or another.

Remember to fine tune your system using the largest tv you have in the house because it magnifies every nuance of the video signal.

Regards,

Erider