"Line source" vs. "point source" speakers.


Can anybody explain the advantages and disadvantages of each? I've been intrugued by the Dali line of speakers. They claim that line source speakers remove room reflections from the sonic equation. I'd be interested in hearing what people have to think, particularly if they use this type of spaeker.

Thanks,
David Shapiro
deshapiro

Showing 1 response by sean

David, you need to clarify if you are looking for input stricly about "front firing line arrays" ( like the Dali primarily is ) or "full range dipolar line sources" as they are VERY different beasts. After all, the Dali is "front firing" for the lows and a good portion of the mids. It only becomes "dipolar" at frequencies above 1.2KHz.

I also think you need to clarify what you mean by "point source" i.e. single driver full range speakers or "standard" front firing multi-ways that are designed to work as a point source due to limited dispersion characteristics. A point source to me is a single driver or possibly a co-axial / tri-axial type driver. Others may think differently, but greater specificity would clear the air : ) Sean
>

PS... Someone from these forums asked me to check these speakers out for them a few months back. You should be aware that even though they use an active crossover between the cones and the ribbon, the ribbons are NOT "direct drive" from the amp. That is, everything above 1.2 KHz is fed to the ribbons courtesy of a capacitor. To me, this is a drastic mistake. I'm sure that they did this as a measure of protecton i.e. trying to keep DC voltages from a "leaky" amp from damaging the ribbons. These speakers are also of a rear ported design, so keep that in mind too.