Moral Dilemma


This is an imaginary situation, but thinking about it will provide insights into your internal ethic proclivities.

The situation: You are in the Middle East, and there is a huge flood in progress. Many homes have been lost, water supplies compromised and structures destroyed.

Let's say that you're a photographer, like myself, getting still photos for a news service, traveling alone, looking for particularly poignant scenes.

You come across Osama Bin Laden who has been swept away by the floodwaters. He is barely hanging on to tree limb and is about to go under.

You can either put down your camera and save him, hoping to redeem and convert him, or take a Pulitzer Prize-winning photograph of him as he loses his grip on the limb.

So, here's the question, and think carefully before you answer it:

Which lens would you use?
128x128Ag insider logo xs@2xalbertporter

Showing 2 responses by 3chihuahuas

Use the lense that's sitting on top of your Smith and Wesson riffle. Here's a better option. Some of you may have heard this suggestion before, but if you didn't, capture the bastard, take him to Beverly Hills' best known plastic surgeon, having him changed into a woman, then drop his ass back into Afghanistan, where the Taliban can beat crap out of him...either that or stick him in the trunk of my BMW and turn up my car stereo with a Beastie Boys CD. Did I forget to mentioned that there are two 15" sub woofers is the trunk? The bass is deafening. If he's still alive after that, which I highly doubted, I'll make him listen to Diana Krall's Spanish version of Basame ;-)