2. amps-preamps
  3. 1269192054

McCormack DNA 500 vs DNA 225 upgraded

I am looking for some feedback on comparing the stock DNA500 to a DNA225 upgraded by Steve McCormack. There were a few posts that only touched that subject. I am thinking about adding one of those amps to my system and relegating the HT5 to the surrrounds and center.

The DNA500 has amazing reviews, as the DNA225 upgraded also does. Is there a benefit to either one? I notice at this point there are no upgrades available on the SMC site for the 500. I imagine the cost for either is similar.

Thanks again for any help. This forum has been outstanding for me to learn from.
still_learning

Showing 1 response by ptmconsulting

ptmconsulting
1,000 posts
 
I had a DNA .5 Rev A and just picked up a DNA 500 used. The same house sound is present in both of these amps. Obviously the headroom on the 500 is just over the top, giving it better dynamics and more "pop". I also really do not need my subwoofer anymore since the bottom end is just deeper and more controlled. There is also an increased soundstage depth and width and presence over the .5 Rev A, by a smidge. My tube preamp mates well with it, but the impediance is a concern for some so check into it. The 500 is also balanced, so you may get more bang for your buck if you have a balanced preamp and source to use with it.

If you like the Mccormack house sound you can't go wrong with either.
More to discover