Mark Levinson No: 333 vs. MCintosh MC 352?

I'm narrowing down to two amps between the ML NO: 333 and MC 352 to drive my B&W N. 802 speaker. Has anyone A/b between the two amps. I'd like to hear your opinion. Thanks

tomj3903-09-2002 5:34pm

Showing 4 responses by ljgj

ljgj Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 955 posts 03-09-2002 at 08:27pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete I have owned the 331 and currently own the 352. The 331 is a pretty good amp but the352 is a great amp that is more natural sounding without the hard edge the ML brings into the picture. Check audioreview.com for more opinions on the 333 and the 352. There was also another similar thread on this subject in amplifiers. By the way I did have both amps (331 and 352) at the same time for awhile.
ljgj Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 955 posts 03-09-2002 at 09:52pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete The audioreview rating for the 333 is 3.7 out of 5 --the 352 is 4.7.
ljgj Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 955 posts 03-10-2002 at 01:07am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete You are right I did find I liked the 352 better than the 500. The dealer recommended the 352 over it also. Really we are talking about all very good amps here though.
ljgj Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 955 posts 03-10-2002 at 01:10pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete You can also mono the 352 to greatly increase its power. I use mine in a biamp situation with the Mac 2102 tube amp on my VMPS RM 40's.

More to discover