Low watt tube amps/pros/cons


300B's, 845's and others. What are some of the benifits of these tubes as well as the limitations. I see someone posted that he has a 15 watt tube amp and wants to get 30hz bass. It is highly unlikely that his amp will deliver as low as 30hz, even if he did find a speaker that went to that level, would the bass have any authority? Also by saying I want to find a speaker that goes to 30hz hows the mids anf highs. IOW I'd never buy any speaker based on the fact that it goes to 25hz, its a package deal.
Back to the main idea here. Can anyone give a list of +'s and the ='s of the low watt tube amps. For myself its not something I'm interested in as all my listenings are classical, and I want the orchestras to sound full rich, dynamic, that is the low and high end extended. I heard a 300B amp, the Cayin, and was incredible with light jazz, blues, but for classical orchestral it fell flat and lifeless. The speakers were the Silverline Sonatas.
bartokfan

Showing 1 response by david12

I agree with Herman "it's all in the application", both for speakers and amps. Particularly in the output transformers. I use a Viva Solista, which is a 2 man lift. Only 22 watts, but it seems to have the grip to drive Wilson Grand Slams. Alright that is an exageration, but it certainly has greater grip than my 50watt Lavardin IT. In terms of speakers and tubes, it seems to me that impedence is more important than sensitivity. A flat impedence not dipping below 6ohms seems more important than 95db sensitivity. Perhaps others will disagree.
Finally, I think there are differences between tubes, given an equally competent application. I can't speak for all tubes and it is not a new observation, 300B's have the mid range magic, 845's greater control at the frequency extremes, i prefer 845's.