Do Passive Pre-Amps 'Limit' the Lower-Mids?


The following is from a comparison between an active (ARC-LS3) pre-amp and passive or pre-amp less system-operation; "Connecting a source-component directly to one's amp is no panacea for sonic realism, in my experience. It can even be a deterrent as the life and body of the sound can be sucked out of a system which is perfectly capable of LIFELIKE reproduction. What is left is a thoroughly competent sound that is crisp and clear but dry and analytical, and also bereft of lower-midrange body, liquid-lucidity and lifelike-musicallity..." The full 'review' is at: Active vs Passive Pre
waj4all

Showing 2 responses by charles1dad

Wai4all,
many share your impressions of passives. I`ll take a high quality active preamp any time for it`s more life like sound tonal realism.YMMV.
Waj4all,
I have`nt heard the TRL Dude but it`s well regarded. I`ve owned the Coincident Statement linestage for close to 2 years. The Statement is simply stunning, utterly natural tone/timbre with complete rendering of intricate overtones and harmonics. Perhaps one of the truly top tier performers in terms of openess, transparent and dynamic preamps available currently.

It does convey the pure emotion and beauty of music without exception. Really just a fabulous creation by designer Israel Blume.

I hope you have an opprotunity to hear it in yours or a very good system and judge for yourself. Be aware it has just two inputs, lacks remote control and is 70 pounds(2 chassis design). By the way it has an ultra low noise floor, you`ll hear the most subtle nuance and micro detail/dynamics(very compelling) and always organic in character.
Best Regards,