Django question

Hi just built one. Previous preamplifier was a Hovland HP 100.

The passive in my opinion is superior. Dynamically it is still superb for a passive and you are immediately hit when you first hear it of how immediately more correct the music sounds. I have now also bought the silver version of the stevens and billington transformers with remote contol.

i am also interested in the django especially the remote version.where did you buy yours?
i have heard that diy hifi will offer one with remote soon.

Where can you get one with a remote?
THanks

Did you order it through SoundOdyssey or direct from DIYHiFiSupply?

As for Audiojoy, sounds more like he has a Bent NOH, or a Django that he's upgraded with parts for the NOH.

I'm not sure the Django comes with the TX102's with the copper wire that Bent used, nor has the silver wired TX102's as an option, so I've been debating getting a Django with just the amorphous transformers and then upgrade it later with parts from Bent, since I want it wired up differently anyway. But at least this way I start to get a feel if passive would play ok for me first.

Or I guess there's waiting for Bent to get their "new NOH" out this fall.

Curious to hear feedback about the unit. I currently run a Meridian 508.20 -> Classe CP-50 -> Classe CA-200, using AQ Lapis X3 balanced interconnects. I think a passive should play into that group of gear fine, although the CP-50 sounded more music, if not as needle threading detailed, as the GFP-750 in passive mode I had before.