Many studio speakers were a bit scooped in the mid range just like Hi-Fi speakers. So it probably isn’t that.
I think it is mostly aesthetics and the fact that studios prefer two extremes of speaker - either a small near-field (at 3 feet) or a massive far-field beast (at 20 feet). The small near-fields go on a desk or meter bridge while the massive far-fields are usually mounted in a soffit for perfect bass response.
Studio speakers tend to be bass shy or lower Q than compared to most small audiophile speakers that are ported to sound big (with a big hump in the bass response). This is for accuracy as professionals don’t want to get the bass wrong because the speaker is emphasizing something too much. A speaker on a desk or meter bridge will get a bass boost. The trusty studio workhorse - the Yamaha NS-10 - only sounds flat when sitting on a desk otherwise it is bass light.
While the small near-fields are within audiophile budgets they don’t do so well when mounted on stands at 8 to 10 feet and the finishes are ugly.
The large main monitors are extremely bulky and ugly and may cost as much as an average audiophile home once installed with all the requisite studio acoustic treatment and design. This simply isn’t an option for most audiophiles. These are mostly used for bass checks or to impress clients who pay for the use of a studio facility.
Another factor may be time domain response or waterfall plot. The Yamaha NS-10 has a nice waterfall which means you hear less speaker coloration (warmth or nasal character). The sealed box means the bass group delay is very good too. All these factors add up to a more faithful reproduction of the source - warts and all.
https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/yamaha-ns10-story
This research paper is also worth reading
https://dt7v1i9vyp3mf.cloudfront.net/assetlibrary/n/ns10m.pdf
I think it is mostly aesthetics and the fact that studios prefer two extremes of speaker - either a small near-field (at 3 feet) or a massive far-field beast (at 20 feet). The small near-fields go on a desk or meter bridge while the massive far-fields are usually mounted in a soffit for perfect bass response.
Studio speakers tend to be bass shy or lower Q than compared to most small audiophile speakers that are ported to sound big (with a big hump in the bass response). This is for accuracy as professionals don’t want to get the bass wrong because the speaker is emphasizing something too much. A speaker on a desk or meter bridge will get a bass boost. The trusty studio workhorse - the Yamaha NS-10 - only sounds flat when sitting on a desk otherwise it is bass light.
While the small near-fields are within audiophile budgets they don’t do so well when mounted on stands at 8 to 10 feet and the finishes are ugly.
The large main monitors are extremely bulky and ugly and may cost as much as an average audiophile home once installed with all the requisite studio acoustic treatment and design. This simply isn’t an option for most audiophiles. These are mostly used for bass checks or to impress clients who pay for the use of a studio facility.
Another factor may be time domain response or waterfall plot. The Yamaha NS-10 has a nice waterfall which means you hear less speaker coloration (warmth or nasal character). The sealed box means the bass group delay is very good too. All these factors add up to a more faithful reproduction of the source - warts and all.
https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/yamaha-ns10-story
This research paper is also worth reading
https://dt7v1i9vyp3mf.cloudfront.net/assetlibrary/n/ns10m.pdf