breaking in audio components


sometimes you get lucky, and a dealer or direct manufacturer enable you to audition a component for a trial period, after which you may return it, or get a refund if you paid for it initially.

sometimes the trial period is 10 days, usually no more than a month.

you place the component in your stereo systems, listen to "test" recordings and try to evaluate its contribution to the sound of your stereo system.

there is the issue of break-in. a component may or not break-in during your trial period.

what criteria do you use to determine that a component has broken in ?

you might ask the dealer or manufacturer how long it takes to break in the component, or how many hours of signal transmission is necessary in order to fairly evaluate the component.

there is always the possibility that the component has not completely "settled" sonically, while in your possession.

there is the chance that if you buy the component, its sound may change after the trial period ends.

is it always a crap shoot when buying components, or has your experience taught you when to tell that any further changes in sound will be minor and not affect your overall sentiment toward the component ?
mrtennis

Showing 1 response by fatparrot

Gunbei, LOL! Horseface, thanks for the info. Nice to learn a new fact that can explain burn-in from a scientific point of view.

Mrtennis , my rule of thumb is that by 72 hours, you will be able to tell the sonic signature of the gear; improvements will continue, but the essence of the sonics will be known. See Horseface's post.

The most obvious improvements that I have heard are a removal of "grain" or edginess of the highs, a tightening of the bass, and an improvement dynamic "punch", and more detail in the micro-dynamics [resolution and separation of very soft passages from the louder passages]. The treble is the easiest improvement to hear, and the bass improvement the next so.