B&W - 704 vs Matrix 804


Hello. Can somebody advise me? I have chance to buy one of this two pairs of B&W speakers at similar price. Which of them should sound better, 704 or Matrix 804?
sirph

Showing 1 response by tjassoc

We had experience with the Matrix 804's.

We continued to improve our system and enjoyed our time with them. We started with a pair of Snell K II's, then the Matrix 804's, then Aerial 10T's, then Watt Puppy 5.1's and now Sasha I's.

The 804's were combined with the following equipment:
Amplifiers: Audio Research V70, Pass Aleph 0's and a Threshold T-200.
Pre-amplifiers were An Audio Research LS2B, a Threshold FET 10 E and then we ran our system without a pre-amp.
Front end digital was a Theta Data III transport and Gen Va DAC, which were good pieces in their era. We also used Meridian 500 series digital components, which were very good performers at the time (we now run Meridian 800 series components).
Cables were upper tier AudioQuest and then MIT.
These speakers were used without and with a sub-woofer - a Janis 12" unit with it's own amplifier and cross-over.

Each transition to our next speaker was an across the board improvement - increased transparency, imaging, bass response, articulation and resolution.

The 804's paired well all of our equipment. We had custom wood stands made for them, 1 1/2" thick solid oak with a lead filled center. They lifted the speaker up about 10" which allowed them to produce a more realistic image - as we felt their tweeters and image presentation was too low.

How did they sound - pretty darn good as I remember. The Aerial 10T's were a significant step up in performance (and cost) but we enjoyed our 804's for many years. Their imaging and natural timber was their strengths. Weakness - ultimate resolution wasn't as high as some of the MUCH more expensive speakers we upgraded to, and bass response wasn't as deep.

Overall, I can confidently recommend them.